The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Andreev tunneling, Coulomb blockade, and resonant transport of nonlocal spin-entangled electrons
Open accessAbstract
We propose and analyze a spin-entangler for electrons based on an s-wave superconductor coupled to two quantum dots, each of which is coupled to normal Fermi leads. We show that in the presence of a voltage bias and in the Coulomb blockade regime two correlated electrons provided by the Andreev process can coherently tunnel from the superconductor via different dots into different leads. The spin singlet coming from the Cooper pair remains preserved in this process, and the setup provides a source of mobile and nonlocal spin-entangled electrons. The transport current is calculated and shown to be dominated by a two-particle Breit-Wigner resonance that allows the injection of two spin-entangled electrons into different leads at exactly the same orbital energy, which is a crucial requirement for the detection of spin entanglement via noise measurements. The coherent tunneling of both electrons into the same lead is suppressed by the on-site Coulomb repulsion and/or the superconducting gap, while the tunneling into different leads is suppressed through the initial separation of the tunneling electrons. In the regime of interest the particle-hole excitations of the leads are shown to be negligible. The Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in the current are shown to contain single- and two-electron periods with amplitudes that both vanish with increasing Coulomb repulsion albeit differently fast.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems
Datta, S. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805776 · Cited by 7,704
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Self-citationQuantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
Cited by
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Cooper pair splitter realized in a two-quantum-dot Y-junction
Hofstetter, L., Csonka, S., Nygård, J., & Schönenberger, C. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08432 · Cited by 517
Transport of quantum states and separation of ions in a dual RF ion trap
Rowe, M. A., Ben-Kish, A., DeMarco, B., Leibfried, D., Meyer, V., Beall, J., Britton, J., Hughes, J., Itano, W. M., Jelenkovic, B., et al. (2002) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic2.4-1 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Recher, P., Sukhorukov, E. V., & Loss, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-04-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W1985683196
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Andreev tunneling, Coulomb blockade, and resonant transport of nonlocal spin-entangled electrons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.63.165314
- The paper
- Recher, P., Sukhorukov, E. V., & Loss, D. (2001). Andreev tunneling, Coulomb blockade, and resonant transport of nonlocal spin-entangled electrons. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.63.165314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.