Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dielectric, infrared, and Raman response of undopedSrTiO3ceramics: Evidence of polar grain boundaries

Petzelt, J., Ostapchuk, T., Gregora, I., Rychetský, I., Hoffmann-Eifert, S., Pronin, A. V., Yuzyuk, Y., Gorshunov, B. P., Kamba, S., Bovtun, V., Pokorný, J., Savinov, M., Porokhonskyy, V., Rafaja, D., Vaněk, P., Almeida, A., Chaves, M. R., Volkov, A. A., Dressel, M., Waser, R.·2001·Physical Review B

Abstract

Thorough Raman and infrared (IR) reflectivity investigations of nominally pure ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}$ ceramics in the 10--300 K range have revealed a clear presence of the polar phase whose manifestation steeply increases on cooling. The Raman strengths of the Raman-forbidden IR modes are proportional to ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{TO}1}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\approx}1.6)$ where ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{TO}1}$ is the polar soft mode frequency. No pronounced permittivity dispersion is observed below the soft mode frequency so that, as in single crystals, the static permittivity is essentially determined by the soft mode contribution. A theory is suggested which assumes a frozen dipole moment connected with the grain boundaries which induces the polar phase in the grain bulk in correlation with the bulk soft-mode frequency. This stiffens slightly the effective soft mode response and reduces the low-temperature permittivity compared to that of single crystals. Moreover, the polar soft mode strongly couples to the ${E}_{g}$ component of the structural soft doublet showing that the polar axis is perpendicular to the tetragonal axis below the structural transition which is shifted to 132 K in our ceramics. Whereas the ${\mathrm{TiO}}_{6}$ octahedra tilt (primary order parameter) below the structural transition corresponds to that in single crystals, much smaller ${A}_{1g}\ensuremath{-}{E}_{g}$ splitting of the structural soft doublet shows that the tetragonal deformation (secondary order parameter) is nearly 10 times smaller, apparently due to the grain volume clamping in ceramics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.64.184111

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Petzelt, J., Ostapchuk, T., Gregora, I., Rychetský, I., Hoffmann-Eifert, S., Pronin, A. V., Yuzyuk, Y., Gorshunov, B. P., Kamba, S., Bovtun, V., Pokorný, J., Savinov, M., Porokhonskyy, V., Rafaja, D., Vaněk, P., Almeida, A., Chaves, M. R., Volkov, A. A., Dressel, M., & Waser, R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2001-10-22
Volume
64
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2020981471
Cited by
273
References
26
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dielectric, infrared, and Raman response of undopedSrTiO3ceramics: Evidence of polar grain boundaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.64.184111
The paper
Petzelt, J., Ostapchuk, T., Gregora, I., Rychetský, I., Hoffmann-Eifert, S., Pronin, A. V., Yuzyuk, Y., Gorshunov, B. P., Kamba, S., Bovtun, V., Pokorný, J., Savinov, M., Porokhonskyy, V., Rafaja, D., Vaněk, P., Almeida, A., Chaves, M. R., Volkov, A. A., Dressel, M., & Waser, R. (2001). Dielectric, infrared, and Raman response of undopedSrTiO3ceramics: Evidence of polar grain boundaries. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.64.184111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.