The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-ranged resonating valence bond physics, quantum dimer models, and Ising gauge theories
Open accessAbstract
Quantum dimer models are believed to capture the essential physics of antiferromagnetic phases dominated by short-ranged valence bond configurations. We show that these models arise as particular limits of Ising ${(Z}_{2})$ gauge theories, but that in these limits the system develops a larger local U(1) invariance that has different consequences on different lattices. Conversely, we note that the standard ${Z}_{2}$ gauge theory is a generalized quantum dimer model, in which the particular relaxation of the hardcore constraint for the dimers breaks the U(1) down to ${Z}_{2}.$ These mappings indicate that at least one realization of the Senthil--Fisher proposal for fractionalization is exactly the short ranged resonating valence bond (RVB) scenario of Anderson and of Kivelson, Rokhsar and Sethna. They also suggest that other realizations will require the identification of a local low energy, Ising link variable and a natural constraint. We also discuss the notion of topological order in ${Z}_{2}$ gauge theories and its connection to earlier ideas in RVB theory. We note that this notion is not central to the experiment proposed by Senthil and Fisher to detect vortices in the conjectured ${Z}_{2}$ gauge field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial
Witten, E. (1989) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01217730 · Cited by 4,758
An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems
Kogut, J. B. (1979) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.659 · Cited by 2,029
Cited by
Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm
Senthil, T., Balents, L., Sachdev, S., Vishwanath, A., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.144407 · Cited by 834
Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator
Keesling, A., Omran, A., Levine, H., Bernien, H., Pichler, H., Choi, S., Samajdar, R., Schwartz, S., Silvi, P., Sachdev, S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1070-1 · Cited by 534
Tailoring molecular layers at metal surfaces
Bartels, L. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.517 · Cited by 451
Hastings, M. B., & Wen, X.-G. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045141 · Cited by 406
Ultracold quantum gases and lattice systems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories
Wiese, U. ‐. (2013) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201300104 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Moessner, R., Sondhi, S. L., & Fradkin, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-12-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W1589375620
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.