Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots

Kuno, M., Fromm, D. P., Johnson, S. T., Gallagher, A., Nesbitt, D. J.·2003·Physical Review B

Abstract

A detailed modeling of recently observed nonexponential fluorescence intermittency in colloidal semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) is presented. In particular, experiments have shown that both ``on''-time and ``off''-time probability densities generated from single-QD fluorescence trajectories follow an inverse power law, $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}/\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}})\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}/\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}^{1+\ensuremath{\alpha}},$ over multiple decades in time, where the exponent $1+\ensuremath{\alpha}$ can, in general, differ for ``on'' versus ``off'' episodes. Several models are considered and tested against their ability to predict inverse power law behavior in both $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}})$ and $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}}).$ A physical picture involving electron tunneling to, and return from, traps located several nanometers away from the QD is found to be consistent with the observed $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}})$ but does not yield the inverse power-law behavior seen in $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}}).$ However, a simple phenomenological model based on exponentially distributed and randomly switched on and off decay rates is analyzed in detail and shown to yield an inverse power-law behavior in both $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}})$ and $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}}).$ Monte Carlo calculations are used to simulate the resulting blinking behavior, and are subsequently compared with experimental observations. Most relevantly, these comparisons indicate that the experimental $\mathrm{o}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}\mathrm{off}$ blinking kinetics are independent of excitation intensity, in contradiction with previous multiphoton models of on/off intermittency based on an Auger-assisted ionization of the QD by recombination of a second electron-hole pair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.67.125304

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Kuno, M., Fromm, D. P., Johnson, S. T., Gallagher, A., & Nesbitt, D. J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2003-03-14
Volume
67
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2028136324
Cited by
287
References
2
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.67.125304
The paper
Kuno, M., Fromm, D. P., Johnson, S. T., Gallagher, A., & Nesbitt, D. J. (2003). Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.67.125304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.