The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots
Abstract
A detailed modeling of recently observed nonexponential fluorescence intermittency in colloidal semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) is presented. In particular, experiments have shown that both ``on''-time and ``off''-time probability densities generated from single-QD fluorescence trajectories follow an inverse power law, $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}/\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}})\ensuremath{\propto}1/{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}/\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}^{1+\ensuremath{\alpha}},$ over multiple decades in time, where the exponent $1+\ensuremath{\alpha}$ can, in general, differ for ``on'' versus ``off'' episodes. Several models are considered and tested against their ability to predict inverse power law behavior in both $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}})$ and $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}}).$ A physical picture involving electron tunneling to, and return from, traps located several nanometers away from the QD is found to be consistent with the observed $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}})$ but does not yield the inverse power-law behavior seen in $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}}).$ However, a simple phenomenological model based on exponentially distributed and randomly switched on and off decay rates is analyzed in detail and shown to yield an inverse power-law behavior in both $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{on}})$ and $P({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{off}}).$ Monte Carlo calculations are used to simulate the resulting blinking behavior, and are subsequently compared with experimental observations. Most relevantly, these comparisons indicate that the experimental $\mathrm{o}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}\mathrm{off}$ blinking kinetics are independent of excitation intensity, in contradiction with previous multiphoton models of on/off intermittency based on an Auger-assisted ionization of the QD by recombination of a second electron-hole pair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Shelved optical electron amplifier: Observation of quantum jumps
Nagourney, W., Sandberg, J., & Dehmelt, H. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.2797 · Cited by 937
Cited by
Kambhampati, P. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp2058673 · Cited by 391
Power-law intermittency of single emitters
CICHOS, F., VONBORCZYSKOWSKI, C., & ORRIT, M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2007.07.012 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuno, M., Fromm, D. P., Johnson, S. T., Gallagher, A., & Nesbitt, D. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-03-14
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2028136324
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.67.125304
- The paper
- Kuno, M., Fromm, D. P., Johnson, S. T., Gallagher, A., & Nesbitt, D. J. (2003). Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.67.125304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.