The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconductors
Open accessAbstract
Quasiclassic Usadel equations for two-band superconductors in the dirty limit are derived with the account of both intraband and interband scattering by nonmagnetic impurities. From these equations, the Ginzburg-Landau equations, and the equations for the critical temperature ${T}_{c}$ and the upper critical field ${H}_{c2}$ are obtained. The equation for ${H}_{c2}$ determines both the temperature dependence of ${H}_{c2}(T)$ and the orientational dependence of ${H}_{c2}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ as a function of the angle $\ensuremath{\theta}$ between $\mathbf{H}$ and the c axis. It is shown that the shape of the ${H}_{c2}(T)$ curve essentially depends on the ratio of the intraband electron diffusivities ${D}_{1}$ and ${D}_{2},$ and can be very different from the one-gap dirty-limit theory. In particular, value ${H}_{c2}(0)$ can considerably exceed ${0.7T}_{c}{\mathrm{dH}}_{c2}{/dT}_{c},$ which can have important consequences for applications of ${\mathrm{MgB}}_{2}.$ Based on a general equation for ${H}_{c2}(T,\ensuremath{\theta}),$ a scaling relation, which enables one to get the angular dependence of ${H}_{c2}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ from the equation for ${H}_{c2}$ at $\mathbf{H}\ensuremath{\Vert}c,$ is proposed. The behavior of ${H}_{c2}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ and ${H}_{c1}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ can deviate markedly from the results of the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau theory, and the ratio of the upper critical field ${H}_{c2}^{\ensuremath{\Vert}}{/H}_{c2}^{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ for $\mathbf{H}\ensuremath{\Vert}\mathrm{ab}$ and $\mathbf{H}\ensuremath{\perp}\mathrm{ab}$ can both increase and decrease with temperature, depending on the relation between ${D}_{1}$ and ${D}_{2}.$ Implications of the obtained results for ${\mathrm{MgB}}_{2}$ are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Upper critical fields and thermally-activated transport ofNdFeAsO0.7F0.3single crystal
Jaroszynski, J., Hunte, F., Balicas, L., Jo, Y.-J., Raičević, I., Gurevich, A., Larbalestier, D. C., Balakirev, F. F., Fang, L., Cheng, P., et al. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.174523 · Cited by 340
Self-citationNakajima, Y., Hu, R., Kirshenbaum, K., Hughes, A., Syers, P., Wang, X., Wang, K., Wang, R., Saha, S. R., Pratt, D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500242 · Cited by 212
High-entropy silicide superconductors with W5Si3 -type structure
Liu, B., Yang, W., Xiao, G., Zhu, Q., Song, S., Cao, G.-H., & Ren, Z. (2023) · Physical Review Materials · doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.014805 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurevich, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-05-16
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 18
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2073427212
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.67.184515
- The paper
- Gurevich, A. (2003). Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconductors. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.67.184515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.