Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite

Rollmann, G., Rohrbach, A., Entel, P., Hafner, J.·2004·Physical Review B

Abstract

Rhombohedral $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ has been studied by using density-functional theory (DFT) and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). For the chosen supercell all possible magnetic configurations have been taken into account. We find an antiferromagnetic ground state at the experimental volume. This state is 388 meV/(Fe atom) below the ferromagnetic solution. For the magnetic moments of the iron atoms we obtain $3.4{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{B}},$ which is about $1.5{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{B}}$ below the experimentally observed value. The insulating nature of $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ is reproduced, with a band gap of 0.32 eV, compared to an experimental value of about 2.0 eV. Analysis of the density of states confirms the strong hybridization between Fe $3d$ and O $2p$ states in $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}.$ When we consider lower volumes, we observe a transition to a metallic, ferromagnetic low-spin phase, together with a structural transition at a pressure of 14 GPa, which is not seen in experiment. In order to take into account the strong on-site Coulomb interaction U present in ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ we also performed $\mathrm{D}\mathrm{F}\mathrm{T}+U$ calculations. We find that with increasing U the size of the band gap and the magnetic moments increase, while other quantities such as equilibrium volume and Fe-Fe distances do not show a monotonic behavior. The transition observed in the GGA calculations is shifted to higher pressures and eventually vanishes for high values of U. Best overall agreement, also with respect to experimental photoemission and inverse photoemission spectra of hematite, is achieved for $U=4\mathrm{eV}.$ The strength of the on-site interactions is sufficient to change the character of the gap from $d\ensuremath{-}d$ to $\mathrm{O}\ensuremath{-}p\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Fe}\ensuremath{-}d.$

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.69.165107

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
Rollmann, G., Rohrbach, A., Entel, P., & Hafner, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2004-04-06
Volume
69
Issue
16
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2060569453
Cited by
495
References
5
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.69.165107
The paper
Rollmann, G., Rohrbach, A., Entel, P., & Hafner, J. (2004). First-principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.69.165107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.