Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stripe order, depinning, and fluctuations inLa1.875Ba0.125CuO4andLa1.875Ba0.075Sr0.050CuO4

Open access
Fujita, M., Goka, H., Yamada, K., Tranquada, J. M., Regnault, L. P.·2004·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a neutron scattering study of stripe correlations measured on a single crystal of ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.875}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{0.125}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$. Within the low-temperature-tetragonal (LTT) phase, superlattice peaks indicative of spin and charge stripe order are observed below $50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. For excitation energies $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\leqslant}12\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{meV}$, we have characterized the magnetic excitations that emerge from the incommensurate magnetic superlattice peaks. In the ordered state, these excitations are similar to spin waves. Following these excitations as a function of temperature, we find that there is relatively little change in the $\mathbf{Q}$-integrated dynamical spin susceptibility for $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\sim}10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{meV}$ as stripe order disappears and then as the structure transforms from LTT to the low-temperature-orthorhombic phase. The $\mathbf{Q}$-integrated signal at lower energies changes more dramatically through these transitions, as it must in a transformation from an ordered to a disordered state. We argue that the continuous evolution through the transitions provides direct evidence that the incommensurate spin excitations in the disordered state are an indicator of dynamical charge stripes. An interesting feature of the thermal evolution is a variation in the incommensurability of the magnetic scattering. Similar behavior is observed in measurements on a single crystal of ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.875}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{0.075}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.050}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$; maps of the scattered intensity in a region centered on the antiferromagnetic wave vector and measured at $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}=4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{meV}$ are well reproduced by a model of disordered stripes with a temperature-dependent mixture of stripe spacings. We discuss the relevance of our results to understanding the magnetic excitations in cuprate superconductors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.70.104517

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Fujita, M., Goka, H., Yamada, K., Tranquada, J. M., & Regnault, L. P.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2004-09-24
Volume
70
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2983504742
Cited by
283
References
68
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stripe order, depinning, and fluctuations inLa1.875Ba0.125CuO4andLa1.875Ba0.075Sr0.050CuO4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.70.104517
The paper
Fujita, M., Goka, H., Yamada, K., Tranquada, J. M., & Regnault, L. P. (2004). Stripe order, depinning, and fluctuations inLa1.875Ba0.125CuO4andLa1.875Ba0.075Sr0.050CuO4. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.70.104517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.