The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Singlet-triplet decoherence due to nuclear spins in a double quantum dot
Open accessAbstract
We have evaluated hyperfine-induced electron spin dynamics for two electrons confined to a double quantum dot. Our quantum solution accounts for decay of a singlet-triplet correlator even in the presence of a fully static nuclear spin system, with no ensemble averaging over initial conditions. In contrast to an earlier semiclassical calculation, which neglects the exchange interaction, we find that the singlet-triplet correlator shows a long-time saturation value that differs from $\frac{1}{2}$, even in the presence of a strong magnetic field. Furthermore, we find that the form of the long-time decay undergoes a transition from a rapid Gaussian to a slow power law $(\ensuremath{\sim}1∕{t}^{3∕2})$ when the exchange interaction becomes nonzero and the singlet-triplet correlator acquires a phase shift given by a universal (parameter independent) value of $3\ensuremath{\pi}∕4$ at long times. The oscillation frequency and time-dependent phase shift of the singlet-triplet correlator can be used to perform a precision measurement of the exchange interaction and Overhauser field fluctuations in an experimentally accessible system. We also address the effect of orbital dephasing on singlet-triplet decoherence and find that there is an optimal operating point where orbital dephasing becomes negligible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Self-citationDensity Matrix Theory and Applications
Blum, K. (2012) · Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20561-3 · Cited by 1,936
Cited by
Spins in few-electron quantum dots
Hanson, R., Kouwenhoven, L. P., Petta, J. R., Tarucha, S., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.1217 · Cited by 2,665
Coherent manipulation of single spins in semiconductors
Hanson, R., & Awschalom, D. D. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07129 · Cited by 503
Quantum Coherence in a One-Electron Semiconductor Charge Qubit
Petersson, K. D., Petta, J. R., Lu, H., & Gossard, A. C. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.246804 · Cited by 379
Relaxation, dephasing, and quantum control of electron spins in double quantum dots
Taylor, J. M., Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Yacoby, A., Marcus, C. M., & Lukin, M. D. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.035315 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Coish, W. A., & Loss, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-09-21
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2012798009
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Singlet-triplet decoherence due to nuclear spins in a double quantum dot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.72.125337
- The paper
- Coish, W. A., & Loss, D. (2005). Singlet-triplet decoherence due to nuclear spins in a double quantum dot. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.72.125337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.