Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Defect energies of graphite: Density-functional calculations

Li, L., Reich, S., Robertson, J.·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

The energies of point defects in graphite have been calculated from first principles. The various interplane interstitial configurations are found to have a wider range of energies than in some earlier calculations, implying a larger interstitial migration energy than previously expected $(>1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV})$. Interplane interstitials are found to be stabilized by a shear of one graphite plane with respect to its neighbors, as this allows the interstitial to bond to three or four atoms in two planes in the ylid and spiro configurations. The minimum interstitial formation energy in sheared graphite is only $5.3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ compared to $6.3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ in perfect graphite. Such interstitials form a strongly bound vacancy-interstitial pair with a formation energy of only $10.2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$. The formation energy of a single vacancy is $7.6\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$. The formation energy and the activation barrier of the Stone-Wales defect in a single layer of graphite were also calculated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.72.184109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Li, L., Reich, S., & Robertson, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-11-30
Volume
72
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2038554150
Cited by
381
References
0
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defect energies of graphite: Density-functional calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.72.184109
The paper
Li, L., Reich, S., & Robertson, J. (2005). Defect energies of graphite: Density-functional calculations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.72.184109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.