Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topological analysis of the quantum Hall effect in graphene: Dirac-Fermi transition across van Hove singularities and edge versus bulk quantum numbers

Open access
Hatsugai, Yasuhiro, Fukui, Takahiro, Aoki, Hideo·2006·Physical Review B

Abstract

Inspired by a recent discovery of a peculiar integer quantum Hall effect (QHE) in graphene, we study QHE on a honeycomb lattice in terms of the topological quantum number, with two interests. First, how the zero-mass Dirac QHE around the center of the tight-binding band crosses over to the ordinary finite-mass fermion QHE around the band edges. Second, how the bulk QHE is related with the edge QHE for the entire spectrum including Dirac and ordinary behaviors. We find the following. (i) The zero-mass Dirac QHE [with ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{xy}=\ensuremath{\mp}(2N+1){e}^{2}∕h,N$: integer] persists, surprisingly, up to the van Hove singularities, at which the ordinary fermion behavior abruptly takes over. Here a technique developed in the lattice gauge theory enabled us to calculate the behavior of the topological number over the entire spectrum. This result indicates a robustness of the topological quantum number, and should be observable if the chemical potential can be varied over a wide range in graphene. (ii) To see if the honeycomb lattice is singular in producing the anomalous QHE, we have systematically surveyed over square $\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}$ honeycomb $\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}$-flux lattices, which is scanned by introducing a diagonal transfer ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. We find that the massless Dirac QHE [$\ensuremath{\propto}(2N+1)$] forms a critical line, that is, the presence of Dirac cones in the Brillouin zone is preserved by the inclusion of ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and the Dirac region sits side by side with ordinary one persists all through the transformation. (iii) We have compared the bulk QHE number obtained by an adiabatic continuity of the Chern number across the square $\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}$ honeycomb $\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}$-flux transformation and numerically obtained edge QHE number calculated from the whole energy spectra for sample with edges, which shows that the bulk QHE number coincides, as in ordinary lattices, with the edge QHE number throughout the lattice transformation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.74.205414

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Hatsugai, Y., Fukui, T., & Aoki, H.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2006-11-13
Volume
74
Issue
20
Pages
205414
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2072790970
Cited by
202
References
9
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topological analysis of the quantum Hall effect in graphene: Dirac-Fermi transition across van Hove singularities and edge versus bulk quantum numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.74.205414
The paper
Hatsugai, Y., Fukui, T., & Aoki, H. (2006). Topological analysis of the quantum Hall effect in graphene: Dirac-Fermi transition across van Hove singularities and edge versus bulk quantum numbers. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.74.205414

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.