Cited by 1,350Graphene research and applications2D Materials and ApplicationsSurface and Thin Film Phenomena

Tight-binding approach to uniaxial strain in graphene

Open access
Pereira, Vitor M., Castro Neto, A. H., Peres, N. M. R.·2009·Physical Review B

Abstract

We analyze the effect of tensional strain in the electronic structure of graphene. In the absence of electron-electron interactions, within linear elasticity theory, and a tight-binding approach, we observe that strain can generate a bulk spectral gap. However, this gap is critical, requiring threshold deformations in excess of 20% and only along preferred directions with respect to the underlying lattice. The gapless Dirac spectrum is robust for small and moderate deformations and the gap appears as a consequence of the merging of the two inequivalent Dirac points only under considerable deformations of the lattice. We discuss how strain-induced anisotropy and local deformations can be used as a means to affect transport characteristics and pinch off current flow in graphene devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.80.045401

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introducing anisotropy along the vertical and diagonal directions into graphene leads to broken six-fold symmetry and level crossing with deformation of the bandstructure.

    “In contrast, introducing the anisotropy along the vertical direction and diagonal direction into the graphene leads to the broken six-fold symmetry and level crossing with the deformation of the bandstructure [29-31].”

    From Observing movement of Dirac cones from single-photon dynamics (2021) · cites this paper as [29]

    The paper reports direction-dependent anisotropy and deformation of graphene’s band structure (VI. Critical Gap, pp. 4–5). It also says the Dirac cones eventually merge under zig-zag strain, but never meet under armchair strain; the gap requires a critical deformation. The cited passages do not identify the directions as “vertical” and “diagonal” or explicitly describe broken six-fold symmetry, so they do not support the claim’s unqualified account of level crossing in both directions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The opening band gap in graphene requires large strain, even exceeding the order of 20%, attributed to deformations and anisotropy by applying strain instead of inner disorders or fluctuation.

    “One should note that the opening band gap in graphene requires large strain, even exceeding the order of 20% [24, 29], which is attributed to the deformations and anisotropy by applying strain instead of the inner disorders or fluctuation of the graphene.”

    From Observing movement of Dirac cones from single-photon dynamics (2021) · cites this paper as [29]

    The opening passage (p. 1) and Discussion (p. 6) say that a bulk spectral gap induced by uniform strain requires deformation exceeding 20% in the paper’s tight-binding model, with the outcome depending on strain direction. The paper attributes gap opening to the merging of Dirac points, not to anisotropy itself, and the cited passages do not establish the claim’s contrast with intrinsic disorder or fluctuations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 40 V. M. Pereira and A. H. Castro Neto, arXiv:0810.4539 (2008). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, V. M., Castro Neto, A. H., & Peres, N. M. R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
80
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1982311541
Cited by
1,350
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 79
FWCI
35.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
Keywords
graphene, uniaxial strain, tension, electronic band structure, Dirac point, strain-induced anisotropy, tight-binding model, linear elasticity, graphene devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review