Wave packet dynamics in hole Luttinger systems
Open accessAbstract
For hole systems with an effective spin 3/2 we analyzed analytically and numerically the evolution of wave packets with the different initial polarizations. The dynamics of such systems is determined by the $4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4$ Luttinger Hamiltonian. We work in the space of arbitrary superposition of light- and heavy-hole states of the ``one-particle system.'' For strong anisotropic packets in three-dimensional semiconductors we obtained the analytical solution for the components of wave function and analyzed the space-time dependence of probability densities as well as angular momentum densities. Depending on the value of the parameter $a={k}_{0}d$ (${k}_{0}$ is the average momentum vector and $d$ is the packet width) two scenarios of evolution are realized. For $a⪢1$ the initial wave packet splits into two parts and the coordinates of packet center experience the transient oscillations or Zitterbewegung (ZB) as for other two-band systems. In the case when $a⪡1$ the distribution of probability density at $t>0$ remains almost cylindrically symmetric and the ripples arise at the circumference of wave packet. The ZB in this case is absent. We evaluated and visualized for different values of parameter $a$ the space-time dependence of angular momentum densities, which have the multipole structure. It was shown that the average momentum components can precess in the absence of external or effective magnetic fields due to the interference of the light- and heavy-hole states. For localized initial states this precession has a transient character.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
David and Cserti considered a general multi-band Hamiltonian and showed that the trembling motion is a superposition of trembling motions corresponding to all possible differences of energy eigenvalues; ZB amplitudes in the position operator are related to the Berry connection matrix.
“David and Cserti [37] considered a general multi-band Hamiltonian and showed that in this case one deals with a trembling motion which is a superposition of trembling motions corresponding to all possible differences of energy eigenvalues. It was also shown, following remarks of [38, 39], that the ZB amplitudes in the position operator are related to the Berry connection matrix appearing in the”
From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
<i>Zitterbewegung</i> and the internal geometry of the electron
Barut, A. O., & Bracken, A. J. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.2454 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Unified description of<i>Zitterbewegung</i>for spintronic, graphene, and superconducting systems
Cserti, J., & Dávid, G. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.172305 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Transient Zitterbewegung of charge carriers in mono- and bilayer graphene, and carbon nanotubes
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.195439 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Theory of electron Zitterbewegung in graphene probed by femtosecond laser pulses
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.045416 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
<i>Zitterbewegung</i>of electrons and holes in III–V semiconductor quantum wells
Schliemann, J., Loss, D., & Westervelt, R. M. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.085323 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Dirac-like behaviour of a non-relativistic tight binding Hamiltonian in one dimension
Cannata, F., Ferrari, L., & Russo, G. (1990) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/0038-1098(90)90192-e · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Zitterbewegung of nearly-free and tightly-bound electrons in semiconductors
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2007) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/13/136219 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review
Zawadzki, W., & Rusin, T. M. (2011) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/23/14/143201 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Demikhovskii, V. Y., Maksimova, G. M., & Frolova, E. V.
- ORCID
- Maksimova, G. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-03-08
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2073308665
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- wave packet dynamics, Luttinger Hamiltonian, spin-3/2, Zitterbewegung, angular momentum density, multipole structure, probability density, two-band systems, semiconductor heterostructures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review