Cited by 27Quantum and electron transport phenomenaTopological Materials and PhenomenaSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

Zitterbewegung of nearly-free and tightly-bound electrons in semiconductors

Open access
Rusin, T M, Zawadzki, W·2007·Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

Abstract

We show theoretically that non-relativistic nearly-free electrons in solids should experience a trembling motion (Zitterbewegung, ZB) in the absence of external fields, similarly to relativistic electrons in a vacuum. The ZB is directly related to the influence of the periodic potential on the free electron motion. The frequency of the ZB is , where E g is the energy gap. The amplitude of the ZB is determined by the strength of periodic potential and the lattice period, and it can be of the order of nanometres. We show that the amplitude of the ZB does not depend much on the width of the wavepacket representing an electron in real space. An analogue of the Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation, known from relativistic quantum mechanics, is introduced in order to decouple electron states in various bands. We demonstrate that after the bands are decoupled electrons should be treated as particles of a finite size. In contrast to nearly-free electrons we consider a two-band model of tightly-bound electrons. We show that in this case also the electrons should experience the trembling motion. It is concluded that the phenomenon of ZB of electrons in crystalline solids is the rule rather than the exception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-8984/19/13/136219

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically, the transient character of Zitterbewegung comes about as a result of waning interference of the two sub-packets belonging to positive and negative energies as they go apart because of different speeds.

    “Physically, the transient character of ZB comes about as a result of waning interference of the two sub-packets belonging to positive and negative energies as they go apart because of different speeds, see (24) and (25) and References [17, 84].”

    From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says Zitterbewegung arises from interference between positive- and negative-energy states, and §4, “Wavepacket” (page unavailable), analyzes electron wavepackets. Neither passage says the oscillation is transient because two sub-packets separate at different speeds and their interference wanes; that mechanism is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If an electron is represented by a wave packet, its ZB has a transient character, i.e. it disappears with time.

    “Lock [6] showed that, if an electron is represented by a wave packet, its ZB has a transient character, i.e. it disappears with time.”

    From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 4 (Wavepacket; page unavailable) models an electron as a Gaussian wavepacket, but discusses how ZB amplitude varies with packet width and wavevector, not whether it disappears over time. Searches for transient, decaying, or disappearing oscillations found no passage in our copy establishing the claim or attributing it to Lock. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a carbon nanotube, after the transient ZB oscillations disappear, a constant shift ̄y_sh remains.

    “It is seen that, after the transient ZB oscillations disappear, there remains a shift ¯ y sh .”

    From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction mentions Zitterbewegung in carbon nanotubes, but does not describe its oscillations fading or a residual shift. The Wavepacket section discusses oscillation amplitudes rather than a lasting displacement; searches for the transient oscillations and y_sh found no passage addressing the claimed shift. Our copy therefore does not verify this claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The decay time of Zitterbewegung is usually much longer in one-dimensional systems.

    “The decay time is usually much longer in one-dimensional systems, see Figure 4 and References [17, 81].”

    From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 4 (Wavepacket; page unavailable) discusses Zitterbewegung oscillations and how their amplitude varies with wavepacket properties, but does not compare decay times across dimensions. Searches for decay time, damping, and longer-lasting oscillations in one-dimensional systems found no passage supporting the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The decay time of Zitterbewegung is inversely proportional to the momentum spread Δk of the wave packet.

    “One can show that the decay time is inversely proportional to the momentum spread ∆ k of the wave packet, see (16) and References [17, 81].”

    From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 4 (Wavepacket; page unavailable) defines the packet’s momentum width and averages the Zitterbewegung oscillation over it, but does not state how decay time depends on that width. I searched for decay time, damping, and an inverse-width relationship; the retrieved passages discuss oscillation amplitude and frequency instead. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pryce M H L 1948 Proc. R. Soc. A 195 62

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics (PL)
Venue
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Published
2007-03-15
Volume
19
Issue
13
Pages
136219
ISSN
  • 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-648X
OpenAlex
W2039545505
Cited by
27
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics Condensed Matter (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Keywords
Zitterbewegung, nearly free electrons, periodic potential, band gap, Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation, two-band model, electron size, semiconductor band structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review