Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor

Open access
Harris, R., Johnson, M. W., Lanting, T., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Bunyk, P., Tolkacheva, E., Ladizinsky, E., Ladizinsky, N., Oh, T., Cioata, F., Perminov, I., Spear, P., Enderud, C., Rich, C., Uchaikin, S., Thom, M. C., Chapple, E. M., Wang, J., Wilson, B., Amin, M. H. S., Dickson, N., Karimi, K., Macready, B., Truncik, C. J. S., Rose, G.·2010·Physical Review B

Abstract

A superconducting chip containing a regular array of flux qubits, tunable interqubit inductive couplers, an XY-addressable readout system, on-chip programmable magnetic memory, and a sparse network of analog control lines has been studied. The architecture of the chip and the infrastructure used to control it were designed to facilitate the implementation of an adiabatic quantum optimization algorithm. The performance of an eight-qubit unit cell on this chip has been characterized by measuring its success in solving a large set of random Ising spin-glass problem instances as a function of temperature. The experimental data are consistent with the predictions of a quantum mechanical model of an eight-qubit system coupled to a thermal environment. These results highlight many of the key practical challenges that we have overcome and those that lie ahead in the quest to realize a functional large-scale adiabatic quantum information processor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.82.024511

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Harris, R., Johnson, M. W., Lanting, T., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Bunyk, P., Tolkacheva, E., Ladizinsky, E., Ladizinsky, N., Oh, T., Cioata, F., Perminov, I., Spear, P., Enderud, C., Rich, C., Uchaikin, S., Thom, M. C., Chapple, E. M., Wang, J., Wilson, B., Amin, M. H. S., Dickson, N., Karimi, K., Macready, B., Truncik, C. J. S., & Rose, G.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
82
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1980289135
Cited by
273
References
52
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.82.024511
The paper
Harris, R., Johnson, M. W., Lanting, T., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Bunyk, P., Tolkacheva, E., Ladizinsky, E., Ladizinsky, N., Oh, T., Cioata, F., Perminov, I., Spear, P., Enderud, C., Rich, C., Uchaikin, S., Thom, M. C., Chapple, E. M., Wang, J., . . . Rose, G. (2010). Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.82.024511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.