The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First-principles study of boron sheets and nanotubes
Abstract
Based on first-principles calculations, we present various properties of single- and double-layered boron sheets, along with single- and double-walled boron nanotubes. Single-layered boron sheets, made of hexagons and triangles, have buckled ground-state geometries if the ratio of triangles to hexagons is large and stay flat otherwise. We demonstrate that this asymmetric behavior of buckling cannot be explained by a simple chemical picture based on $\ensuremath{\sigma}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\pi}$ mixing. Instead, reduction in the electronic kinetic energy is the driving force for buckling. In addition, we show that double-layered boron sheets can form strong interlayer bonds between two layers only if the precursor single-layered sheet itself prefers a buckled ground-state structure. The optimal double-layered boron sheet in our library is semiconducting and is more stable than any single-layered sheet. Next, we discuss the curvature energies, buckling behavior and soliton structural fluctuations for single-walled boron nanotubes and the implications for the electronic properties of these nanotubes: our main finding is that the semiconducting nature of small-diameter single-walled nanotubes is robust under various perturbations and fluctuations. We end by showing that due to strong bonds forming between walls, the optimal double-walled boron nanotubes have different wall structures from single-walled ones. Such double-walled nanotubes are always more stable than any single-walled nanotube and are furthermore metallic for the likely experimentally relevant diameter range. We conclude with the implications of these results for fabricated nanotube systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
Understanding Boron through Size-Selected Clusters: Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Fluxionality
Sergeeva, A. P., Popov, I. A., Piazza, Z. A., Li, W.-L., Romanescu, C., Wang, L.-S., & Boldyrev, A. I. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400310g · Cited by 608
Prediction of phonon-mediated superconductivity in borophene
Gao, M., Li, Q.-Z., Yan, X.-W., & Wang, J. (2017) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.024505 · Cited by 293
Honeycomb Boron Allotropes with Dirac Cones: A True Analogue to Graphene
Yi, W.-C., Liu, W., Botana, J., Zhao, L., Liu, Z., Liu, J.-Y., & Miao, M.-S. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00891 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, H., & Ismail-Beigi, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-09-08
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1974477998
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles study of boron sheets and nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.82.115412
- The paper
- Tang, H., & Ismail-Beigi, S. (2010). First-principles study of boron sheets and nanotubes. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.82.115412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.