Cited by 23Topological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Merging Dirac points and topological phase transitions in the tight-binding model on the generalized honeycomb lattice

Open access
Hasegawa, Yasumasa, Kishigi, Keita·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

Moving, merging, and annihilating Dirac points are studied theoretically in the tight-binding model on honeycomb lattice with up-to third-nearest-neighbor hoppings. We obtain a rich phase diagram of the topological phase transitions in the parameter space of direction-dependent hoppings. We obtain the conditions for the three Dirac points to merge and for the tricritical points. We find that only very small third-nearest-neighbor hoppings are enough for the existence of the merging of three-Dirac-points and the tricritical points, if the system is sufficiently anisotropic. The density of states is obtained to be $D(\ensuremath{\epsilon})\ensuremath{\propto}{|\ensuremath{\epsilon}|}^{1/3}$ when three Dirac points merge, and $D(\ensuremath{\epsilon})\ensuremath{\propto}{|\ensuremath{\epsilon}|}^{1/4}$ at the tricritical points. It is possible to realize these topological phase transitions in the ultracold atoms on the optical lattice, strained monolayer graphene, or strained bilayer graphene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.86.165430

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introducing anisotropy along the vertical and diagonal directions into graphene leads to broken six-fold symmetry and level crossing with deformation of the bandstructure.

    “In contrast, introducing the anisotropy along the vertical direction and diagonal direction into the graphene leads to the broken six-fold symmetry and level crossing with the deformation of the bandstructure [29-31].”

    From Observing movement of Dirac cones from single-photon dynamics (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (p. 1) links broken rotational symmetry to moving and merging Dirac points and says that direction-dependent hoppings can move, merge, and annihilate them, changing the energy gap. The paper also compares a six-fold-symmetric case (p. 8) with lower-symmetry cases (p. 9; Appendix B, p. 13). Our copy does not specifically establish that anisotropy along the vertical and diagonal directions produces the claimed level crossing and bandstructure deformation. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 14 G. Montambaux, arXiv:1205.4459v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2012). · arXiv
  2. 22 K. Kishigi, R. Takeda, and Y. Hasegawa, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 132 , 012005 (2008).
  3. 26 K. Kishigi, K. Ueno, E. Miyamoto, and Y. Hasegawa, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 334 , 012047 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasegawa, Y., & Kishigi, K.
Affiliations
University of Hyogo (JP)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-10-18
Volume
86
Issue
16
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2023162788
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Kumamoto University Repository (Kumamoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Kumamoto University Repository System (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
Dirac point, topological phase transition, tight-binding model, anisotropic hopping, tricritical point, density of states, ultracold atoms in optical lattices, strained graphene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review