Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermal conductivity of bulk and nanowire Mg2SixSn1−xalloys from first principles

Li, Wu, Lindsay, L., Broido, D. A., Stewart, Derek A., Mingo, Natalio·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

The lattice thermal conductivity ($\ensuremath{\kappa}$) of the thermoelectric materials, Mg${}_{2}$Si, Mg${}_{2}$Sn, and their alloys, are calculated for bulk and nanowires, without adjustable parameters. We find good agreement with bulk experimental results. For large nanowire diameters, size effects are stronger for the alloy than for the pure compounds. For example, in 200 nm diameter nanowires $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ is lower than its bulk value by 30$%$, 20$%$, and 20$%$ for Mg${}_{2}$Si${}_{0.6}$Sn${}_{0.4}$, Mg${}_{2}$Si, and Mg${}_{2}$Sn, respectively. For nanowires less than 20 nm thick, the relative decrease surpasses 50$%$, and it becomes larger in the pure compounds than in the alloy. At room temperature, $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ of Mg${}_{2}$Si${}_{x}$Sn${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ is less sensitive to nanostructuring size effects than Si${}_{x}$Ge${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$, but more sensitive than PbTe${}_{x}$Se${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$. This suggests that further improvement of Mg${}_{2}$Si${}_{x}$Sn${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ as a nontoxic thermoelectric may be possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.86.174307

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., Lindsay, L., Broido, D. A., Stewart, D. A., & Mingo, N.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-11-29
Volume
86
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2156485711
Cited by
616
References
38
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.