The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twist defects and projective non-Abelian braiding statistics
Open accessAbstract
It has recently been realized that a general class of non-Abelian defects can be created in conventional topological states by introducing extrinsic defects, such as lattice dislocations or superconductor-ferromagnet domain walls in conventional quantum Hall states or topological insulators. In this paper, we begin by placing these defects within the broader conceptual scheme of extrinsic twist defects associated with symmetries of the topological state. We explicitly study several classes of examples, including ${Z}_{2}$ and ${Z}_{3}$ twist defects, where the topological state with $N$ twist defects can be mapped to a topological state without twist defects on a genus $g\ensuremath{\propto}N$ surface. To emphasize this connection we refer to the twist defects as genons. We develop methods to compute the projective non-Abelian braiding statistics of the genons, and we find the braiding is given by adiabatic modular transformations, or Dehn twists, of the topological state on the effective genus $g$ surface. We study the relation between this projective braiding statistics and the ordinary non-Abelian braiding statistics obtained when the genons become deconfined, finite-energy excitations. We find that the braiding is generally different, in contrast to the Majorana case, which opens the possibility for fundamentally novel behavior. We find situations where the genons have quantum dimension 2 and can be used for universal topological quantum computing (TQC), while the host topological state is by itself nonuniversal for TQC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colloquium : Topological insulators
Hasan, M. Z., & Kane, C. L. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 · Cited by 19,930
Topological insulators and superconductors
Qi, X.-L., & Zhang, S.-C. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1057 · Cited by 14,394
Self-citationNon-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation
Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 · Cited by 6,861
Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond
Kitaev, A. (2006) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 · Cited by 5,245
Read, N., & Green, D. (2000) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.10267 · Cited by 3,476
Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect
Moore, G., & Read, N. (1991) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90407-o · Cited by 2,968
New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems
Alicea, J. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/7/076501 · Cited by 2,854
Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks
Alicea, J., Oreg, Y., Refael, G., von Oppen, F., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1915 · Cited by 1,636
Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems
Wen, X.-G. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227259.001.0001 · Cited by 1,349
High-Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States
Tang, E., Mei, J.-W., & Wen, X.-G. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.236802 · Cited by 1,195
Cited by
Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation
Sarma, S. D., Freedman, M., & Nayak, C. (2015) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2015.1 · Cited by 1,180
Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases
Barkeshli, M., Bonderson, P., Cheng, M., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.115147 · Cited by 533
Self-citationTopological Quantum Computation—From Basic Concepts to First Experiments
Stern, A., & Lindner, N. H. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231473 · Cited by 342
Non-Abelian braiding of graph vertices in a superconducting processor
Collaborators, G. Q. A. A., Andersen, T. I., Lensky, Y. D., Kechedzhi, K., Drozdov, I. K., Bengtsson, A., Hong, S., Morvan, A., Mi, X., Opremcak, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05954-4 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Barkeshli, M., Jian, C.-M., & Qi, X.-L.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-01-31
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1808471149
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 15.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twist defects and projective non-Abelian braiding statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.87.045130
- The paper
- Barkeshli, M., Jian, C.-M., & Qi, X.-L. (2013). Twist defects and projective non-Abelian braiding statistics. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.87.045130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.