Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Raman study on defective graphene: Effect of the excitation energy, type, and amount of defects

Open access
Eckmann, Axel, Felten, Alexandre, Verzhbitskiy, Ivan, Davey, Rebecca, Casiraghi, Cinzia·2013·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a detailed Raman study of defective graphene samples containing specific types of defects. In particular, we compared ${\mathit{sp}}^{3}$ sites, vacancies, and substitutional Boron atoms. We find that the ratio between the $D$ and $G$ peak intensities, $I$($D$)/$I$($G$), does not depend on the geometry of the defect (within the Raman spectrometer resolution). In contrast, in the limit of low defect concentration, the ratio between the ${D}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and $G$ peak intensities is higher for vacancies than ${\mathit{sp}}^{3}$ sites. By using the local activation model, we attribute this difference to the term $C$${}_{S,x}$, representing the Raman cross section of $I$($x$)/$I$($G$) associated with the distortion of the crystal lattice after defect introduction per unit of damaged area, where $x$ $=$ $D$ or ${D}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. We observed that ${C}_{S,D}=0$ for all the defects analyzed, while ${C}_{S,{D}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$ of vacancies is 2.5 times larger than ${C}_{S,{D}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$ of ${\mathit{sp}}^{3}$ sites. This makes $I$($D$)/$I$(${D}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) strongly sensitive to the nature of the defect. We also show that the exact dependence of $I$($D$)/$I$(${D}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) on the excitation energy may be affected by the nature of the defect. These results can be used to obtain further insights into the Raman scattering process (in particular for the ${D}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ peak) in order to improve our understanding and modeling of defects in graphene.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.88.035426

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Eckmann, A., Felten, A., Verzhbitskiy, I., Davey, R., & Casiraghi, C.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2013-07-15
Volume
88
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2141381531
Cited by
375
References
94
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Raman study on defective graphene: Effect of the excitation energy, type, and amount of defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.88.035426
The paper
Eckmann, A., Felten, A., Verzhbitskiy, I., Davey, R., & Casiraghi, C. (2013). Raman study on defective graphene: Effect of the excitation energy, type, and amount of defects. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.88.035426

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.