Cited by 128Topological Materials and PhenomenaMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research

Tight-binding couplings in microwave artificial graphene

Open access
Bellec, Matthieu, Kuhl, Ulrich, Montambaux, Gilles, Mortessagne, Fabrice·2013·Physical Review B

Abstract

We experimentally study the propagation of microwaves in an artificial honeycomb lattice made of dielectric resonators. This evanescent propagation is well described by a tight-binding model, very much like the propagation of electrons in graphene. We measure the density of states, as well as the wave function associated with each eigenfrequency. By changing the distance between the resonators, it is possible to modulate the amplitude of next-(next-)nearest-neighbor hopping parameters and to study their effect on the density of states. The main effect is the density of states becoming dissymmetric and a shift of the energy of the Dirac points. We study the basic elements: an isolated resonator, a two-level system, and a square lattice. Our observations are in good agreement with analytical solutions for corresponding infinite lattice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.88.115437

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, varieties of artificial systems have enabled the imitation and exploration of graphene and Dirac cones using the honeycomb structure with controllable parameters and observables beyond traditional graphene itself.

    “Recently, varieties of artificial systems have enabled the imitation and exploration of graphene and Dirac cones using the honeycomb structure with controllable parameters and observables [10-25] beyond traditional graphene itself where those are not easily accessible.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellec, M., Kuhl, U., Montambaux, G., & Mortessagne, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2013-09-30
Volume
88
Issue
11
Pages
115437
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2086264842
Cited by
128
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Keywords
artificial graphene, microwave propagation, dielectric resonators, honeycomb lattice, tight-binding model, evanescent waves, density of states, Dirac point, next-nearest-neighbor hopping, resonator spacing, square lattice, two-level system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review