Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

X-ray photoemission studies of diamond, graphite, and glassy carbon valence bands

Open access
McFeely, F. R., Kowalczyk, S. P., Ley, L., Cavell, R. G., Pollak, R. A., Shirley, D. A.·1974·Physical Review B

Abstract

The high-resolution x-ray photoemission spectra (XPS) of the total valence bands of atomically clean diamond, graphite, and glassy carbon, obtained with monochromatized Al $K\ensuremath{\alpha}$ radiation, are reported and discussed. By comparing valence-band and carbon-$1s$ photoelectron kinetic energies, the XPS valence-band spectra ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ of diamond and graphite were rigorously affixed to the same energy scale as earlier $K$ x-ray emission spectra $\mathcal{I}(E)$. The two spectra---${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ and $\mathcal{I}(E)$---have very different energy dependences of intensity because selection rules and cross-section ratios render $\mathcal{I}(E)$ sensitive only to $2p$ character and ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ far more sensitive to $2s$ character. Taken together, ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ and $\mathcal{I}(E)$ show that the fractional $p$ character in the diamond valence band increases from \ensuremath{\sim} 16% at the bottom of the band to \ensuremath{\sim} 92% at the top, with an average hybridization of $\ensuremath{\sim}{s}^{1.2}{p}^{2.8}$. The spectra agree well with the density of states of Painter et al., but indicate a valence-band width of 24.2(10) eV rather than their 20.8 eV. The $\mathrm{C}(1s)$ binding energy of 284.68(20) eV in graphite agrees well with a recent theoretical estimate of 284.4(3) eV by Davis and Shirley. Analysis of ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ and $\mathcal{I}(E)$ for graphite resolves the valence bands cleanly into $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bands, with the spectrum ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ of the former resembling that of diamond, but with a stronger $2s$ admixture ($s{p}^{2}$ vs $s{p}^{3}$). The XPS cross section of the $({p}_{z})\ensuremath{\pi}$ bands was very low, as expected by symmetry. The bandwidth of 24(1) eV somewhat exceeded Painter and Ellis's calculated value of 19.3 eV. Glassy carbon showed an ${I}^{\ensuremath{'}}(E)$ between that of diamond and graphite, consistent with an amorphous lattice containing both trigonal and tetrahedral bonds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.9.5268

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
McFeely, F. R., Kowalczyk, S. P., Ley, L., Cavell, R. G., Pollak, R. A., & Shirley, D. A.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1974-06-15
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
5268-5278
ISSN
0556-2805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064903819
Cited by
554
References
8
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-ray photoemission studies of diamond, graphite, and glassy carbon valence bands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.9.5268
The paper
McFeely, F. R., Kowalczyk, S. P., Ley, L., Cavell, R. G., Pollak, R. A., & Shirley, D. A. (1974). X-ray photoemission studies of diamond, graphite, and glassy carbon valence bands. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.9.5268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.