Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monoclinic crystal structure ofα−RuCl3and the zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state

Open access
Johnson, R. D., Williams, S. C., Haghighirad, A. A., Singleton, J., Zapf, V., Manuel, P., Mazin, I. I., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O., Valentí, R., Coldea, R.·2015·Physical Review B

Abstract

The layered honeycomb magnet $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{RuCl}}_{3}$ has been proposed as a candidate to realize a Kitaev spin model with strongly frustrated, bond-dependent, anisotropic interactions between spin-orbit entangled ${j}_{\mathrm{eff}}=\frac{1}{2}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{Ru}}^{3+}$ magnetic moments. Here, we report a detailed study of the three-dimensional crystal structure using x-ray diffraction on untwinned crystals combined with structural relaxation calculations. We consider several models for the stacking of honeycomb layers and find evidence for a parent crystal structure with a monoclinic unit cell corresponding to a stacking of layers with a unidirectional in-plane offset, with occasional in-plane sliding stacking faults, in contrast with the currently assumed trigonal three-layer stacking periodicity. We report electronic band-structure calculations for the monoclinic structure, which find support for the applicability of the ${j}_{\mathrm{eff}}=\frac{1}{2}$ picture once spin-orbit coupling and electron correlations are included. Of the three nearest-neighbor Ru-Ru bonds that comprise the honeycomb lattice, the monoclinic structure makes the bond parallel to the $b$ axis nonequivalent to the other two, and we propose that the resulting differences in the magnitude of the anisotropic exchange along these bonds could provide a natural mechanism to explain the previously reported spin gap in powder inelastic neutron scattering measurements, in contrast to spin models based on the three-fold symmetric trigonal structure, which predict a gapless spectrum within linear spin wave theory. Our susceptibility measurements on both powders and stacked crystals, as well as magnetic neutron powder diffraction, show a single magnetic transition upon cooling below ${T}_{\mathrm{N}}\ensuremath{\approx}13$ K. The analysis of our neutron powder diffraction data provides evidence for zigzag magnetic order in the honeycomb layers with an antiferromagnetic stacking between layers. Magnetization measurements on stacked single crystals in pulsed field up to 60 T show a single transition around 8 T for in-plane fields followed by a gradual, asymptotic approach to magnetization saturation, as characteristic of strongly anisotropic exchange interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.92.235119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, R. D., Williams, S. C., Haghighirad, A. A., Singleton, J., Zapf, V., Manuel, P., Mazin, I. I., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O., Valentí, R., & Coldea, R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2015-12-10
Volume
92
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2232069743
Cited by
512
References
1
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoclinic crystal structure ofα−RuCl3and the zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.92.235119
The paper
Johnson, R. D., Williams, S. C., Haghighirad, A. A., Singleton, J., Zapf, V., Manuel, P., Mazin, I. I., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O., Valentí, R., & Coldea, R. (2015). Monoclinic crystal structure ofα−RuCl3and the zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.235119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.