The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning techniques are applied to make prediction models of the ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ band gaps for 270 inorganic compounds using Kohn-Sham (KS) band gaps, cohesive energy, crystalline volume per atom, and other fundamental information of constituent elements as predictors. Ordinary least squares regression (OLSR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and nonlinear support vector regression (SVR) methods are applied with two levels of predictor sets. When the KS band gap by generalized gradient approximation of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) or modified Becke-Johnson (mBJ) is used as a single predictor, the OLSR model predicts the ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ band gap of randomly selected test data with the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.59 eV. When KS band gap by PBE and mBJ methods are used together with a set of predictors representing constituent elements and compounds, the RMSE decreases significantly. The best model by SVR yields the RMSE of 0.24 eV. Band gaps estimated in this way should be useful as predictors for virtual screening of a large set of materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Physics of Semiconductor Devices
Sze, S. M., & Ng, K. K. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470068329 · Cited by 14,627
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces
Behler, J., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 · Cited by 5,010
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
Curtarolo, S., Setyawan, W., Wang, S., Xue, J., Yang, K., Taylor, R. H., Nelson, L. J., Hart, G. L. W., Sanvito, S., Buongiorno-Nardelli, M., et al. (2012) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002 · Cited by 1,148
Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The Δ-Machine Learning Approach
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00099 · Cited by 911
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 · Cited by 2,607
Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects
Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 · Cited by 1,945
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Machine Learning for Catalysis Informatics: Recent Applications and Prospects
Toyao, T., Maeno, Z., Takakusagi, S., Kamachi, T., Takigawa, I., & Shimizu, K.-I. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b04186 · Cited by 617
Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning in Materials Science
Morgan, D., & Jacobs, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010015 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Seko, A., Shitara, K., Nakayama, K., & Tanaka, I.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-03-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W1800437104
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.93.115104
- The paper
- Lee, J., Seko, A., Shitara, K., Nakayama, K., & Tanaka, I. (2016). Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.93.115104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
