Cited by 1,148Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesThermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AFLOWLIB.ORG: A distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations

Curtarolo, Stefano, Setyawan, Wahyu, Wang, Shidong, Xue, Junkai, Yang, Kesong, Taylor, Richard H., Nelson, Lance J., Hart, Gus L.W., Sanvito, Stefano, Buongiorno-Nardelli, Marco, Mingo, Natalio, Levy, Ohad·2012·Computational Materials Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational approaches championed by the Materials Project, OQMD, AFLOWLIB and NOMAD have used density functional theory as approximations of physical energies.

    “Instead, computational approaches championed by the Materials Project (MP)16, the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD)17, AFLOWLIB20 and NOMAD21 have used first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) as approximations of physical energies.”

    From Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. White, 2002, Acta Cryst. B, 58, 343, 10.1107/S0108768102002902 · DOI
  2. Belsky, 2002, Acta Cryst., B58, 364, 10.1107/S0108768102006948 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Villars, 2004, J. Alloys Comp., 367, 293, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.058 · DOI
  4. Villars, 2001, J. Alloys Comp., 317–318, 26, 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01410-9 · DOI
  5. S. Curtarolo, W. Setyawan, G.L.W. Hart, M. Jahnatek, R.V. Chepulskii, R.H. Taylor, S. Wang, J. Xue, K. Yang, O. Levy, M. Mehl, H.T. Stokes, D.O. Demchenko, D. Morgan, AFLOW: An Automatic Framework for High-throughput Materials Discovery, Comput. Mater. Sci. (2012), doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005. · DOI
  6. Jain, 2011, Comput. Mater. Sci., 50, 2295, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023 · DOI
  7. de Fontaine, 1994, Cluster approach to order-disorder transformations in alloys, vol. 47
  8. Taylor, 2011, Phys. Rev. B, 84, 084101, 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.084101 · DOI
  9. Levy, 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 833, 10.1021/ja908879y · DOI
  10. Levy, 2011, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 158, 10.1021/ja1091672 · DOI
  11. Jahnatek, 2011, Phys. Rev. B, 84, 214110, 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.214110 · DOI
  12. Harutyunyan, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 195502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.195502 · DOI
  13. Curtarolo, 2008, Phys. Rev. B, 78, 054105, 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.054105 · DOI
  14. Chepulskii, 2011, ACS Nano, 5, 247, 10.1021/nn102570c · DOI
  15. Curtarolo, 2005, Calphad, 29, 163, 10.1016/j.calphad.2005.01.002 · DOI
  16. Levy, 2010, Acta Mater., 58, 2887, 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.017 · DOI
  17. Levy, 2012, Phys. Rev. B, 85, 012201, 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.012201 · DOI
  18. Levy, 2010, Phys. Rev. B, 81, 174106, 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174106 · DOI
  19. Mighell, 1993, Acta Cryst., A49, c409, 10.1107/S0108767378088492 · DOI
  20. Setyawan, 2011, ACS Comb. Sci., 13, 382, 10.1021/co200012w · DOI
  21. Wang, 2011, Phys. Rev. X, 1, 021012
  22. Setyawan, 2010, Comput. Mater. Sci., 49, 299, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Vining, 2009, Nat. Mater., 8, 83, 10.1038/nmat2361 · DOI
  24. Joshi, 2008, Nano Lett., 8, 4670, 10.1021/nl8026795 · DOI
  25. Jones, 2011, Nature, 472, 22, 10.1038/472022a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Curtarolo, S., Setyawan, W., Wang, S., Xue, J., Yang, K., Taylor, R. H., Nelson, L. J., Hart, G. L. W., Sanvito, S., Buongiorno-Nardelli, M., Mingo, N., & Levy, O.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Venue
Computational Materials Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
58
Pages
227-235
ISSN
0927-0256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117363206
Cited by
1,148
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computational Materials Science (publishedVersion)
  • Computational Materials Science
Funders
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-09-1-0921, N00014-10-1-0436, N00014-11-1-0136)
  • Science Foundation Ireland (07/IN.1/I945)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Weizmann Institute of Science
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-0639822, DMR-0908753)
  • Basic Energy Sciences
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
Keywords
materials database, AFLOW, high-throughput ab initio calculations, phase diagram, thermodynamic properties of alloys, electronic structure, magnetic properties, spintronics, metastable structures, structure discovery, binary systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review