The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of correlations on neutrino opacities in nuclear matter
Open accessAbstract
Including nucleon-nucleon correlations due to both Fermi statistics and nuclear forces, we have developed a general formalism for calculating the neutral-current neutrino-nucleon scattering rates in nuclear matter. We derive corrections to the dynamic structure factors due to both density and spin correlations and find that neutrino-nucleon scattering rates are suppressed by large factors around and above nuclear density. Hence, in particular for the ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ neutrinos, but also for the ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ neutrinos, supernova cores are more ``transparent'' than previously thought. The many-body corrections increase with density, decrease with temperature, and are roughly independent of incident neutrino energy. In addition, we find that the spectrum of energy transfers in neutrino scattering is considerably broadened by the interactions in the medium. An identifiable component of this broadening comes from the absorption and emission of quanta of collective modes akin to the Gamow-Teller and giant dipole resonances in nuclei (zero sound; spin sound), with \ifmmode \check{C}\else \v{C}\fi{}erenkov kinematics. Under the assumption that both the charged-current and the neutral-current cross sections are decreased by many-body effects, we calculate a set of ad hoc protoneutron star cooling models to gauge the potential importance of the new opacities to the supernova itself. While the early luminosities are not altered, the luminosities after many hundreds of milliseconds to seconds can be increased by factors that range from 10 to 100 %. Such enhancements may have a bearing on the efficacy of the neutrino-driven supernova mechanism, the delay to explosion, the energy of the explosion, and the strength and relative role of convective overturn at late times. However, the actual consequences, if any, of these new neutrino opacities remain to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Cited by
Theory of core-collapse supernovae
JANKA, H., LANGANKE, K., MAREK, A., MARTINEZPINEDO, G., & MULLER, B. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.002 · Cited by 904
Neutrino Signal of Electron-Capture Supernovae from Core Collapse to Cooling
Hüdepohl, L., Müller, B., Janka, H.-T., Marek, A., & Raffelt, G. G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.251101 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Burrows, A., & Sawyer, R. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 554-571
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W1997231139
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of correlations on neutrino opacities in nuclear matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.58.554
- The paper
- Burrows, A., & Sawyer, R. F. (1998). Effects of correlations on neutrino opacities in nuclear matter. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.58.554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.