Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 577

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soft-core hyperon-nucleon potentials

Open access
Rijken, Th. A., Stoks, V. G. J., Yamamoto, Y.·1999·Physical Review C

Abstract

A new Nijmegen soft-core OBE potential model is presented for the low-energy $\mathrm{YN}$ interactions. Besides the results for the fit to the scattering data, which largely defines the model, we also present some applications to hypernuclear systems using the G-matrix method. The potentials are generated by the exchange of nonets of pseudoscalar, vector, and scalar mesons. As is standard in the Nijmegen soft-core models, we also include the $J=0$ contributions from the tensor ${f}_{2}{,f}_{2}^{\ensuremath{'}}{,a}_{2},$ and pomeron Regge trajectories, and use Gaussian form factors to guarantee that the potentials have a soft behavior near the origin. An important innovation with respect to the original soft-core potential is the assignment of the cutoff masses for the baryon-baryon-meson (BBM) vertices in accordance with broken $\mathrm{SU}{(3)}_{F},$ which serves to connect the $\mathrm{NN}$ and the $\mathrm{YN}$ channels. As a novel feature, we allow for medium strong breaking of the coupling constants, using the ${}^{3}{P}_{0}$ model with a Gell-Mann--Okubo hypercharge breaking for the BBM coupling. Charge-symmetry breaking in the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}p$ and $\ensuremath{\Lambda}n$ channels is included as well. We present six hyperon-nucleon potentials which describe the available $\mathrm{YN}$ cross section data equally well, but which exhibit some differences on a more detailed level. The differences are constructed such that the models encompass a range of scattering lengths in the $\ensuremath{\Sigma}N$ and $\ensuremath{\Lambda}N$ channels. In all cases, we obtained ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}{/N}_{\mathrm{data}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.55$ for 35 $\mathrm{YN}$ data. In particular, we were able to fit the precise experimental datum ${r}_{R}=0.468\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.010$ for the inelastic capture ratio at rest. For the scalar-meson mixing angle we obtained values ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{S}=37\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}--40\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},$ which points to almost ideal mixing angles for the scalar $q\overline{q}$ states. The G-matrix results indicate that the remarkably different spin-spin terms of the six potentials appear specifically in the energy spectra of $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$ hypernuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevc.59.21

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 577

Metadata

Authors
Rijken, T. A., Stoks, V. G. J., & Yamamoto, Y.
Venue
Physical Review C
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
21-40
ISSN
  • 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-490X
OpenAlex
W1970449920
Cited by
577
References
19
FWCI
19.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft-core hyperon-nucleon potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.59.21
The paper
Rijken, T. A., Stoks, V. G. J., & Yamamoto, Y. (1999). Soft-core hyperon-nucleon potentials. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.59.21

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.