The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2 + 1 dimensions for relativistic heavy-ion collisions
Open accessAbstract
We explore the effects of shear viscosity on the hydrodynamic evolution and final hadron spectra of Cu + Cu collisions at ultrarelativistic collision energies, using the newly developed (2 + 1)-dimensional viscous hydrodynamic code VISH2+1. Based on the causal Israel-Stewart formalism, this code describes the transverse evolution of longitudinally boost-invariant systems without azimuthal symmetry around the beam direction. Shear viscosity is shown to decelerate the longitudinal and accelerate the transverse hydrodynamic expansion. For fixed initial conditions, this leads to a longer quark-gluon plasma (QGP) lifetime, larger radial flow in the final state, and flatter transverse momentum spectra for the emitted hadrons compared to ideal fluid dynamic simulations. We find that the elliptic flow coefficient ${v}_{2}$ is particularly sensitive to shear viscosity: even the lowest value allowed by the AdS/CFT conjecture $\ensuremath{\eta}/s\ensuremath{\geqslant}1/4\ensuremath{\pi}$ suppresses ${v}_{2}$ enough to have significant consequences for the phenomenology of heavy-ion collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). A comparison between our numerical results and earlier analytic estimates of viscous effects within a blast-wave model parametrization of the expanding fireball at freeze-out reveals that the full dynamical theory leads to much tighter constraints for the specific shear viscosity $\ensuremath{\eta}/s$, thereby supporting the notion that the quark-gluon plasma created at RHIC exhibits almost ``perfect fluidity.''
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region
Bjorken, J. D. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 · Cited by 2,796
Cited by
Conformal relativistic viscous hydrodynamics: Applications to RHIC results atsNN=200GeV
Luzum, M., & Romatschke, P. (2008) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.034915 · Cited by 817
Bernhard, J. E., Moreland, J. S., Bass, S. A., Liu, J., & Heinz, U. (2016) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.024907 · Cited by 508
Self-citationFirst Results from Pb+Pb Collisions at the LHC
Müller, B., Schukraft, J., & Wysłouch, B. (2012) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094910 · Cited by 450
Nearly perfect fluidity: from cold atomic gases to hot quark gluon plasmas
Schäfer, T., & Teaney, D. (2009) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126001 · Cited by 438
Higher flow harmonics from(3+1)D event-by-event viscous hydrodynamics
Schenke, B., Jeon, S., & Gale, C. (2012) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.024901 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, H., & Heinz, U.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-06-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2099782109
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.