The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we study the effect of well-known higher-order corrections to the allowed $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay spectrum on the determination of antineutrino spectra resulting from the decays of fission fragments. In particular, we try to estimate the associated theory errors and find that induced currents like weak magnetism may ultimately limit our ability to improve the current accuracy and under certain circumstance could even greatly increase the theoretical errors. We also perform a critical evaluation of the errors associated with our method to extract the antineutrino spectrum using synthetic $\ensuremath{\beta}$ spectra. It turns out that a fit using only virtual $\ensuremath{\beta}$ branches with a judicious choice of the effective nuclear charge provides results with a minimal bias. We apply this method to actual data for ${}^{235}$U, ${}^{239}$Pu, and ${}^{241}$Pu and confirm, within errors, recent results, which indicate a net $3%$ upward shift in energy-averaged antineutrino fluxes. However, we also find significant shape differences which can, in principle, be tested by high-statistics antineutrino data samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Esteban, I., Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C., Hernandez-Cabezudo, A., Maltoni, M., & Schwetz, T. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)106 · Cited by 720
Reactorν¯edisappearance in the Double Chooz experiment
Abe, Y., Aberle, C., dos Anjos, J. C., Barriere, J. C., Bergevin, M., Bernstein, A., Bezerra, T. J. C., Bezrukhov, L., Blucher, E., Bowden, N. S., et al. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.052008 · Cited by 373
From the Trees to the Forest: A Review of Radiative Neutrino Mass Models
Cai, Y., Herrero García, J., Schmidt, M. A., Vicente, A., & Volkas, R. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00063 · Cited by 341
(2022) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103927 · Cited by 322
Neutrino physics from the cosmic microwave background and large scale structure
Abazajian, K. N., Arnold, K., Austermann, J., Benson, B. A., Bischoff, C., Bock, J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Calabrese, E., Carlstrom, J. E., et al. (2015) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.05.014 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-08-29
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W1997223642
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.84.024617
- The paper
- Huber, P. (2011). Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.84.024617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.