Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 840

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors

Open access
Huber, Patrick·2011·Physical Review C

Abstract

In this paper we study the effect of well-known higher-order corrections to the allowed $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay spectrum on the determination of antineutrino spectra resulting from the decays of fission fragments. In particular, we try to estimate the associated theory errors and find that induced currents like weak magnetism may ultimately limit our ability to improve the current accuracy and under certain circumstance could even greatly increase the theoretical errors. We also perform a critical evaluation of the errors associated with our method to extract the antineutrino spectrum using synthetic $\ensuremath{\beta}$ spectra. It turns out that a fit using only virtual $\ensuremath{\beta}$ branches with a judicious choice of the effective nuclear charge provides results with a minimal bias. We apply this method to actual data for ${}^{235}$U, ${}^{239}$Pu, and ${}^{241}$Pu and confirm, within errors, recent results, which indicate a net $3%$ upward shift in energy-averaged antineutrino fluxes. However, we also find significant shape differences which can, in principle, be tested by high-statistics antineutrino data samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevc.84.024617

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 840

Metadata

Authors
Huber, P.
Venue
Physical Review C
Published
2011-08-29
Volume
84
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-490X
OpenAlex
W1997223642
Cited by
840
References
0
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.84.024617
The paper
Huber, P. (2011). Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.84.024617

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.