The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
JUNO physics and detector
Open accessAbstract
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a 20 kton liquid scintillator detector in a laboratory at 700-m underground. An excellent energy resolution and a large fiducial volume offer exciting opportunities for addressing many important topics in neutrino and astroparticle physics. With six years of data, the neutrino mass ordering can be determined at a 3-4σ significance and the neutrino oscillation parameters sin2 θ12, ∆m21, and |∆m32| can be measured to a precision of 0.6% or better, by detecting reactor antineutrinos from the Taishan and Yangjiang nuclear power plants. With ten years of data, neutrinos from all past core-collapse supernovae could be observed at a 3σ significance; a lower limit of the proton lifetime, 8.34× 1033 years (90% C.L.), can be set by searching for p → ν̄K+; detection of solar neutrinos would shed new light on the solar metallicity problem and examine the vacuum-matter transition region. A typical core-collapse supernova at a distance of 10 kpc would lead to ∼ 5000 inverse-beta-decay events and ∼ 2000 (300) all-flavor neutrino-proton (electron) elastic scattering events in JUNO. Geoneutrinos can be detected with a rate of ∼ 400 events per year. Construction of the detector is very challenging. In this review, we summarize the final design of the JUNO detector and the key R&D achievements, following the Conceptual Design Report in 2015 [2]. All 20-inch PMTs have been procured and tested. The average photon detection efficiency is 28.9% for the 15,000 MCP PMTs and 28.1% for the 5,000 dynode PMTs, higher than the JUNO requirement of 27%. Together with the > 20 m attenuation length of the liquid scintillator achieved in a 20-ton pilot purification test and the > 96% transparency of the acrylic panel, we expect a yield of 1345 photoelectrons per MeV and an effective relative energy resolution of 3.02%/ √ E(MeV) in simulations [3]. To maintain the high performance, the underwater electronics is designed to have a loss rate < 0.5% in six years. With degassing membranes and a micro-bubble system, the radon concentration in the 35 kton water pool could be lowered to < 10 mBq/m3. Acrylic panels of radiopurity < 0.5 ppt U/Th for the 35.4-m diameter liquid scintillator vessel are produced with a dedicated production line. The 20 kton liquid scintillator will be purified onsite with Alumina filtration, distillation, water extraction, and gas stripping. Together with other low background handling, singles in the fiducial volume can be controlled to ∼ 10 Hz. The JUNO experiment also features a double calorimeter system with 25,600 3-inch PMTs, a liquid scintillator testing facility OSIRIS, and a near detector TAO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 · Cited by 25,106
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · cited 1×
“Putative primordial black holes (PBH) are a viable candidate for the cold DM [147], and detectable in the mass range of (1015 · · · 1016) g via neutrinos and antineutrinos that are emitted as part of the Hawking radiation [148].”
BackgroundEvidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos
Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Ishino, H., Itow, Y., Kajita, T., Kameda, J., Kasuga, S., et al. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 · Cited by 5,067
Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces
Georgi, H., & Glashow, S. L. (1974) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.32.438 · Cited by 4,514
Neutrino oscillations in matter
Wolfenstein, L. (1978) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.2369 · Cited by 4,125
Witten, E. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.272 · Cited by 3,452
Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories
Hooft, G. '. (1974) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90486-6 · Cited by 3,379
Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles
Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., & Sakata, S. (1962) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.28.870 · Cited by 3,355
Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals
Feldman, G. J., & Cousins, R. D. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.3873 · Cited by 3,125
The evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,247
Metadata
- Venue
- Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 103927
- ISSN
- 0146-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205092497
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: JUNO physics and detector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103927
- The paper
- JUNO physics and detector. (2022). Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.