Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian truncation errors in chiral effective field theory: Nucleon-nucleon observables

Open access
Melendez, J. A., Wesolowski, S., Furnstahl, R. J.·2017·Physical Review C

Abstract

Chiral effective field theory (EFT) predictions are necessarily truncated at some order in the EFT expansion. Bayesian analysis has been proposed as a means to quantify the theoretical uncertainties that are induced by that truncation, in order to provide a robust statistical comparison with experiment. The authors apply a Bayesian model to an extended set of observables calculated for a class of EFT interactions, and demonstrate that a subset of these potentials are consistent with their statistical model for order-by-order convergence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevc.96.024003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Melendez, J. A., Wesolowski, S., & Furnstahl, R. J.
Venue
Physical Review C
Published
2017-08-03
Volume
96
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9985
  • 2469-9993
OpenAlex
W2608703652
Cited by
162
References
3
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian truncation errors in chiral effective field theory: Nucleon-nucleon observables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.96.024003
The paper
Melendez, J. A., Wesolowski, S., & Furnstahl, R. J. (2017). Bayesian truncation errors in chiral effective field theory: Nucleon-nucleon observables. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.96.024003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.