The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion
Open accessAbstract
We present $\mathit{NN}$ potentials through five orders of chiral effective field theory ranging from leading order (LO) to next-to-next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (${\mathrm{N}}^{4}\mathrm{LO}$). The construction may be perceived as consistent in the sense that the same power counting scheme as well as the same cutoff procedures are applied in all orders. Moreover, the long-range parts of these potentials are fixed by the very accurate $\ensuremath{\pi}N$ low-energy constants (LECs) as determined in the Roy-Steiner equations analysis by Hoferichter, Ruiz de Elvira, and coworkers. In fact, the uncertainties of these LECs are so small that a variation within the errors leads to effects that are essentially negligible, reducing the error budget of predictions considerably. The $\mathit{NN}$ potentials are fit to the world $\mathit{NN}$ data below the pion-production threshold of the year 2016. The potential of the highest order (${\mathrm{N}}^{4}\mathrm{LO}$) reproduces the world $\mathit{NN}$ data with the outstanding ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$/datum of 1.15, which is the highest precision ever accomplished for any chiral $\mathit{NN}$ potential to date. The $\mathit{NN}$ potentials presented may serve as a solid basis for systematic ab initio calculations of nuclear structure and reactions that allow for a comprehensive error analysis. In particular, the consistent order by order development of the potentials will make possible a reliable determination of the truncation error at each order. Our family of potentials is nonlocal and, generally, of soft character. This feature is reflected in the fact that the predictions for the triton binding energy (from two-body forces only) converges to about 8.1 MeV at the highest orders. This leaves room for three-nucleon-force contributions of moderate size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olive, K. A. (2014) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · Cited by 6,897
Chiral perturbation theory to one loop
Gasser, J., & Leutwyler, H. (1984) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2 · Cited by 4,022
Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking
Wiringa, R. B., Stoks, V. G. J., & Schiavilla, R. (1995) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.51.38 · Cited by 3,167
The bonn meson-exchange model for the nucleon—nucleon interaction
Machleidt, R., Holinde, K., & Elster, C. (1987) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(87)80002-9 · Cited by 2,447
Self-citationModern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential
Machleidt, R. (2001) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.63.024001 · Cited by 1,787
Self-citationChiral effective field theory and nuclear forces
Machleidt, R., & Entem, D. R. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,612
Self-citationAccurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory
Entem, D. R., & Machleidt, R. (2003) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.68.041001 · Cited by 1,574
Self-citationNuclear forces from chiral lagrangians
Weinberg, S. (1990) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90938-3 · Cited by 1,473
Construction of high-quality NN potential models
Stoks, V. G. J., Klomp, R. A. M., Terheggen, C. P. F., & de Swart, J. J. (1994) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.49.2950 · Cited by 1,387
Cited by
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state
Burgio, G. F., Schulze, H.-J., Vidaña, I., & Wei, J.-B. (2021) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Entem, D. R., Machleidt, R., & Nosyk, Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-08-10
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9985
- 2469-9993
- OpenAlex
- W2744267405
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.96.024004
- The paper
- Entem, D. R., Machleidt, R., & Nosyk, Y. (2017). High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.96.024004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.