The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects
Open accessAbstract
The properties of compact binaries, such as masses and spins, are imprinted in the gravitational waves (GWs) they emit and can be measured using parametrized waveform models. Accurately and efficiently describing the complicated precessional dynamics of the various angular momenta of the system in these waveform models is the object of active investigation. One of the key models extensively used in the analysis of LIGO and Virgo data is the single-precessing-spin waveform model IMRPhenomPv2. In this article we present a new model IMRPhenomPv3, which includes the effects of two independent spins in the precession dynamics. Whereas IMRPhenomPv2 utilizes a single-spin frequency-dependent post-Newtonian rotation to describe precession effects, the improved model, IMRPhenomPv3, employs a double-spin rotation that is based on recent developments in the description of precessional dynamics. Besides double-spin precession, the improved model benefits from a more accurate description of precessional effects. We validate our new model against a large set of precessing numerical-relativity simulations. We find that IMRPhenomPv3 has better agreement with the inspiral portion of precessing binary-black-hole simulations and is more robust across a larger region of the parameter space than IMRPhenomPv2. As a first application we analyze the gravitational-wave event GW151226 with an efficient frequency-domain waveform model that describes two-spin precession. Within statistical uncertainty our results are consistent with published results. IMRPhenomPv3 will allow studies of the measurability of individual spins of binary black holes using GWs and can be used as a foundation upon which to build further improvements, such as modeling precession through merger, extending to higher multipoles, and including tidal effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
Cited by
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationGW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 · Cited by 657
Self-citationPratten, G., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., Mateu-Lucena, M., Jaume, R., Haney, M., Keitel, D., Thompson, J. E., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104056 · Cited by 555
Pratten, G., Husa, S., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., & Jaume, R. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064001 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S., Chatziioannou, K., Hannam, M., & Ohme, F.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-07-29
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2893895103
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.