The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 82 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordström gravity
Open accessAbstract
When classical degrees of freedom and quantum degrees of freedom are consistently coupled, the former diffuse, while the latter undergo decoherence. Here, we construct a theory of quantum matter fields and Nordström gravity in which the space-time metric is treated classically. The dynamics is constructed via the classical-quantum path integral and is completely positive, trace preserving (CPTP) and respects the classical-quantum split. The weak-field limit of the model matches the Newtonian limit of the full covariant path integral, but it is easier to show that the theory is both diffeomorphism invariant and CPTP and has the appropriate classical limit. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
The paper constructs a diffeomorphism-invariant classical-quantum path integral for Nordström gravity, with a classical conformal metric coupled to quantum matter. It shows the theory is completely positive, trace-preserving, preserves the classical-quantum split, and has a Newtonian limit matching earlier weak-field CQ gravity results.
Key findings
- A diffeomorphism-invariant CQ path integral for Nordström gravity is constructed by treating the conformal factor as the stochastic gravitational potential and imposing conformal flatness via a delta functional/Lagrange multiplier.
- The dynamics are completely positive and trace-preserving, and with the saturated decoherence-diffusion trade-off \(4D_0 = D^{-1}_2\), the path integral preserves purity of the quantum state conditioned on the classical degrees of freedom.
- In the Newtonian \(c \to \infty\) limit, the theory gives the Newtonian interaction on average and matches the Newtonian limit of [33], while necessarily including diffusion away from the Newtonian solution lower-bounded by the decoherence rate into mass eigenstates.
- The construction demonstrates no tension between diffeomorphism invariance, stochastic CQ dynamics, and the classical-quantum split, though Nordström gravity remains a toy model that does not describe all gravitational phenomena.
Methods
- The authors use the classical-quantum path integral formalism, writing a CQ action of the form that guarantees complete positivity, with classical and quantum branches and a Feynman-Vernon-like decoherence term.
- They specialize to Nordström gravity, where the classical degree of freedom is the conformal factor \(\Phi\) in \(g_{\mu\nu}=e^{2\Phi/c^2}\eta_{\mu\nu}\), and impose conformal flatness \(C^\mu{}_{\nu\rho\sigma}=0\) through a Lagrange multiplier.
- They take the Newtonian \(c\to\infty\) limit with pressureless dust matter, recovering a randomly sourced Poisson equation and the same decoherence-diffusion relation as in prior Newtonian CQ gravity work.
Limitations
- The paper states that Nordström gravity is a toy model: it lacks the ability to describe some gravitational phenomena, does not predict light bending, fails to predict the correct time-delay factor, and misses subleading corrections to static test-particle acceleration.
- The theory is diffeomorphism invariant but not background independent; it has a preferred frame given by the requirement that the metric be conformally flat.
- The paper notes that in the \(c\to\infty\) limit the path integral becomes discontinuous, a remnant of the approximation, and that the action is suggestive of an effective theory requiring higher-derivative kinetic terms for normalization.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 4 Not valid · 51 Not checked · 74 Own results and interpretations
In the paper
“Nevertheless, we recover the same Newtonian limit behavior as in [33], suggesting that the resolution of the constraints and the resulting dynamics was correct.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dynamics is constructed via the classical-quantum path integral and is completely positive, trace preserving (CPTP), and respects the classical-quantum split.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Newtonian c → ∞ limit we find that the theory gives rise to the Newtonian interaction on average.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > I. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The weak field limit of the model matches the Newtonian limit of the full covariant path integral but it is easier to show that the theory is both diffeomorphism invariant, CPTP, and has the appropriate classical limit.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any path integral with an action of the form in Equation ( 3) is completely positive [31] and the scalar gravity CQ theory we consider in Section IV is of this type.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > II. PATH INTEGRAL FOR CQ DYNAMICS
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
62 more claims
Create a free account to see all 129 claims and every source verdict.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 42
- Probably not a substantial claim. 33
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > II. PATH INTEGRAL FOR CQ DYNAMICS
“the ϕ -field is the ket-field, while the ϕ + field is the bra-field.”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > II. PATH INTEGRAL FOR CQ DYNAMICS
“ϱ(z, ϕ + , ϕ -, t) |ϕ + ⟩ ⟨ϕ -|”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > CQ Nordstrom
“- √ -gD 0 (x) 8 T [ϕ + m ] -T [ϕ - m ] 2”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > CQ Nordstrom
“- cD 0 (x)e 6Φ c 2 8 m + (x) -m -(x) 2”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > CQ Nordstrom
“- √ -gc 8 D 0 (x) 1152 π 2 G 2 N R - 24πG N c 4 T [ϕ + m , ϕ - m ] 2”
§ Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordstrom gravity > CQ Nordstrom
“- c 7 D 0 (x) 192 π 2 G 2 N -e Φ c 2 □e Φ c 2 + 4πG N e 6Φ c 2 c 2 m(x) 2”
Citations
Cites
Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
(1966) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1966.0063 · Cited by 9,537
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 · Cited by 3,385
The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system
Feynman, R. P., & Vernon, F. L. (1963) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(63)90068-x · Cited by 2,914
Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.470 · Cited by 2,798
Options: A Monte Carlo approach
Boyle, P. P. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90005-8 · Cited by 1,336
Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P., & Rimini, A. (1990) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.42.78 · Cited by 1,136
Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization
Pearle, P. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.39.2277 · Cited by 942
Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity
Bose, S., Mazumdar, A., Morley, G. W., Ulbricht, H., Toroš, M., Paternostro, M., Geraci, A. A., Barker, P. F., Kim, M. S., & Milburn, G. J. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240401 · Cited by 913
Quantum theory and measurement
Redhead, M. L. G. (1984) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(84)90022-x · Cited by 807
Marletto, C., & Vedral, V. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240402 · Cited by 805
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Iwao Sato, 1950, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. 1: Phys. Chem. Astron., 33, 30
- Christian Møller, 1962, Théor. Relat. Gravit. Colloq. Int. CNRS, 91, 2
- Nicolas Gisin, 1989, Helv. Phys. Acta, 62, 363
- David Poulin, 2017, Frontiers of Quantum Information Physics
- G. C. Ghirardi, 1985, Quantum Probability and Applications
- Finn Ravndal, 2004, Comment. Phys. Math. Soc. Sci. Fenn., 166, 151
- Michael Ostrogradsky, 1850, Mémoire sur les équations différentielles relatives an probléme des isopérimétres
- 10.1103/physrevlett.119.240402 · DOI
- 10.1103/physrevd.34.470 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity
Oppenheim, J., Sparaciari, C., Šoda, B., & Weller-Davies, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43348-2 · Cited by 98
Self-citationThe open effective field theory of inflation
Salcedo, S. A., Colas, T., & Pajer, E. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)248 · Cited by 80
Covariant Path Integrals for Quantum Fields Backreacting on Classical Space-Time
Oppenheim, J., & Weller-Davies, Z. (2026) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/2rcd-dzcf · Cited by 34
Self-citationLayton, I., & Oppenheim, J. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020331 · Cited by 30
Self-citationAnomalous contribution to galactic rotation curves due to stochastic spacetimePreprint
Oppenheim, J., & Russo, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.19459 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oppenheim, J., Russo, A., & Weller-Davies, Z.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2024-07-03
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W4400283784
- Semantic Scholar
- 2b131611deb73f7635d23b5d2beec4d23bf082bb
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- National Science Foundation (PHY11-25915)
- Simons Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- diffeomorphism invariance, decoherence, weak-field limit, Newtonian limit, classical limit, quantum gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
