Cited by 2,798Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems

Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T.·1986·Physical Review D

Abstract

An explicit model allowing a unified description of microscopic and macroscopic systems is exhibited. First, a modified quantum dynamics for the description of macroscopic objects is constructed and it is shown that it forbids the occurrence of linear superpositions of states localized in far-away spatial regions and induces an evolution agreeing with classical mechanics. This dynamics also allows a description of the evolution in terms of trajectories. To set up a unified description of all physical phenomena, a modification of the dynamics, with respect to the standard Hamiltonian one, is then postulated also for microscopic systems. It is shown that one can consistently deduce from it the previously considered dynamics for the center of mass of macroscopic systems. Choosing in an appropriate way the parameters of the so-obtained model one can show that both the standard quantum theory for microscopic objects and the classical behavior for macroscopic objects can all be derived in a consistent way. In the case of a macroscopic system one can obtain, by means of appropriate approximations, a description of the evolution in terms of a phase-space density distribution obeying a Fokker-Planck diffusion equation. The model also provides the basis for a conceptually appealing description of quantum measurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.34.470

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous and gravity-induced collapse models.

    “Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous16–20 and gravity-induced21–23 collapse models (cf. 24 for a review).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T.
Affiliations
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1986-07-15
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
470-491
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082739523
Cited by
2,798
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 103
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
quantum-to-classical transition, superposition states, classical trajectories, center of mass dynamics, phase space density, Fokker-Planck diffusion, quantum measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review