Cited by 1,307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black holes and thermodynamics

Hawking, S. W.·1976·Physical Review D

Abstract

A black hole of given mass, angular momentum, and charge can have a large number of different unobservable internal configurations which reflect the possible different initial configurations of the matter which collapsed to produce the hole. The logarithm of this number can be regarded as the entropy of the black hole and is a measure of the amount of information about the initial state which was lost in the formation of the black hole. If one makes the hypothesis that the entropy is finite, one can deduce that the black holes must emit thermal radiation at some nonzero temperature. Conversely, the recently derived quantum-mechanical result that black holes do emit thermal radiation at temperature $\frac{\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\hbar}}{2\ensuremath{\pi}kc}$, where $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ is the surface gravity, enables one to prove that the entropy is finite and is equal to $\frac{{c}^{3}A}{4G\ensuremath{\hbar}}$, where $A$ is the surface area of the event horizon or boundary of the black hole. Because black holes have negative specific heat, they cannot be in stable thermal equilibrium except when the additional energy available is less than 1/4 the mass of the black hole. This means that the standard statistical-mechanical canonical ensemble cannot be applied when gravitational interactions are important. Black holes behave in a completely random and time-symmetric way and are indistinguishable, for an external observer, from white holes. The irreversibility that appea…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.13.191

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy-area relation is S = k_B c3 A[H]/(4ħG).

    “This is encapsulated by the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy-area relation,”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [114]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. C. W. Misner, 1973, Gravitation
  2. B. S. DeWitt, 1975, Phys. Rep., 19C, 295, 10.1016/0370-1573(75)90051-4 · DOI
  3. U. H. Gerlach, Phys. Rev. D
  4. L. Parker, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 1519, 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1519 · DOI
  5. J. D. Bekenstein, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2333, 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333 · DOI · Paper page
  6. J. D. Bekenstein, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 9, 3292, 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3292 · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. W. Hawking, 1972, Commun. Math. Phys., 25, 152, 10.1007/BF01877517 · DOI · Paper page
  8. W. Israel, 1967, Phys. Rev., 164, 1776, 10.1103/PhysRev.164.1776 · DOI
  9. B. Carter, 1970, Phys. Rev. Lett., 26, 331, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331 · DOI
  10. H. Muller zum Hagen, 1973, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 4, 53, 10.1007/BF00769760 · DOI
  11. D. C. Robinson, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 458, 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.458 · DOI
  12. D. C. Robinson, 1975, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.905 · DOI
  13. R. Hagedorn, 1973, Cargèse Lectures in Physics
  14. S. C. Frautschi, 1971, Phys. Rev. D., 3, 2821, 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2821 · DOI
  15. H. Everett, 1957, Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 454, 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hawking, S. W.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1976-01-15
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
191-197
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
1,307
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review