Cited by 124Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

Entropy Evaporated by a Black Hole

Zurek, W. H.·1982·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

It is shown that the entropy of the radiation evaporated by an uncharged, nonrotating black hole into vacuum in the course of its lifetime is approximately $\frac{4}{3}$ times the initial entropy of this black hole. Also considered is a thermodynamically reversible process in which an increase of black-hole entropy is equal to the decrease of the entropy of its surroundings. Implications of these results for the generalized second law of thermodynamics and for the interpretation of black-hole entropy are pointed out.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.49.1683

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the evaporating black hole, the Page time is 1/3 of the black hole lifetime; this fits with reasoning [33] that radiating into cold surrounding space is irreversible and the entropy of the radiation grows at twice the evaporation rate of the black hole.

    “For the evaporating black hole the Page time comes out to be 1/3 of the black hole lifetime. This fits with the following simple reasoning [33]. Radiating into a cold surrounding space is an irreversible process and the entropy of the radiation grows at twice the evaporation rate of the black hole.”

    From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

  • The matter entropy rises twice as fast as the black hole entropy decreases.

    “From the above, one sees that the matter entropy rises twice as fast as the black hole entropy decreases, which is no coincidence (Zurek 1982; Fiola et al. 1994).”
  • For d = 1, numerical results indicate that the entropy is S = κ1 log(MR) + κ2 log(μR).

    “In fact, the numerical results indicate that S = κ 1 log( MR )+ κ 2 log( µR ) in one dimension; for the first time, we see a dependence on the infrared cutoff µ [6].”

    From Entropy and area (1993) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zurek, W. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Zurek, W. H.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1982-12-06
Volume
49
Issue
23
Pages
1683-1686
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053923400
Cited by
124
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
black hole entropy, black hole evaporation, Hawking radiation, entropy loss, generalized second law of thermodynamics, black hole thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review