Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black-hole evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler formalism

Damour, Thibaut, Ruffini, Remo·1976·Physical Review D

Abstract

A generalization of the classical approach of barrier penetration introduced by Klein, Sauter, Heisenberg, and Euler to curved spaces endowed with future horizons is given. This technique allows one to recover most directly results obtained by Hawking recently. The treatment here presented encompasses, as special cases, the works of Deruelle and Ruffini, of Damour and Ruffini, and of Nakamura and Sato.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.14.332

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Damour, T., & Ruffini, R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1976-07-15
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
332-334
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072468491
Cited by
590
References
2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black-hole evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler formalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.14.332
The paper
Damour, T., & Ruffini, R. (1976). Black-hole evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler formalism. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.14.332

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.