Cited by 149

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vacuum polarization in a nonsimply connected spacetime

Ford, L. H.·1980·Physical Review D

Abstract

The vacuum polarization tensor of spinor electrodynamics is calculated to order ${e}^{2}$ in a nonsimply connected spacetime with the topology of ${S}^{1}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{R}^{3}$, flat spacetime with periodicity in one spatial dimension. In contrast to the situation in a simply connected spacetime, there are two distinct types of spinors in this spacetime, the untwisted spinors and the twisted spinors. The vacuum polarization due to each type of spinor is calculated; it is found that the two types of spinors give rise to different vacuum polarization effects and hence must be regarded as physically inequivalent. The effect of the vacuum polarization upon photon propagation is considered, and it is shown that untwisted spinors give rise to noncausal effects whereas twisted spinors do not. The vacuum energy for a free spinor field in ${S}^{1}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{R}^{3}$ is also calculated, and it is found that the twisted configuration gives rise to a vacuum state of lower energy than does the untwisted configuration. Various methods of incorporating twisted and untwisted spinors into the same theory, either as distinct fields or as different sectors of the same field theory, are discussed. No tractable method of incorporating both types of spinors is found which avoids the difficulty of noncausal photon propagation. It is therefore proposed that only the twisted spinors should be regarded as having physical significance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.21.933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a free scalar field of arbitrary mass with non-minimal Rφ^2 coupling, the tunneling condition uniquely specifies the full quantum state.

    “Refs.[28][29][30][31][32] collectively show that for a free scalar field of arbitrary mass, with a non-minimal Rϕ 2 coupling to gravity, the tunneling condition uniquely specifies the full quantum state.”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. L. H. Ford, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A
  2. B. S. Kay, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 20, 3052, 10.1103/PhysRevD.20.3052 · DOI
  3. L. H. Ford, 1979, Phys. Lett., 70A, 89, 10.1016/0375-9601(79)90032-X · DOI
  4. C. J. Isham, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A362, 383, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0140 · DOI
  5. C. J. Isham, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A364, 591, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0219 · DOI
  6. H. R. Petry, 1979, J. Math. Phys., 20, 231, 10.1063/1.524069 · DOI
  7. G. 't Hooft, 1972, Nucl. Phys., B44, 189, 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90279-9 · DOI
  8. C. G. Bollini, 1972, Nuovo Cimento, 12B, 20, 10.1007/BF02895558 · DOI
  9. J. D. Bjorken, 1965, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
  10. B. S. DeWitt, Schwinger Festschrift
  11. B. Schroer, 1971, Phys. Rev. D, 3, 1764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.1764 · DOI
  12. F. A. E. Pirani, 1970, Phys. Rev. D, 1, 3224, 10.1103/PhysRevD.1.3224 · DOI
  13. H. M. Fried, 1972, Functional Methods and Models in Quantum Field Theory
  14. S. J. Avis, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A363, 581, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0184 · DOI
  15. S. J. Avis, 1953, Higher Transcendental Functions (Bateman Manuscript Project)
  16. E. Lindelöf, 1905, Le Calcul des Résidues
  17. G. Ghika, 1978, Nuovo Cimento, 46A, 25, 10.1007/BF02799577 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ford, L. H.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1980-02-15
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
933-948
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
149
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review