Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 710

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How super-renormalizable interactions cure their infrared divergences

Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.·1981·Physical Review D

Abstract

Perturbative expansions in models which possess super-renormalizable interactions of massless fields are beset by severe infrared divergences. We show that the complete theory is well defined and has no such divergences; rather the exact amplitudes are nonanalytic functions of the coupling constant and cannot be expanded in its powers. Typically, logarithms of the coupling constant occur, as well as analytic pieces. The analytic portions cannot be found in perturbation theory; they are determined by matrix elements of composite operators. But the nonanalytic behavior is completely fixed in terms of the theory's other parameters. The present investigation should be relevant to a study of physical quantum chromodynamics at its finite-temperature phase transitions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.23.2291

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 710

Metadata

Authors
Jackiw, R., & Templeton, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1981-05-15
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
2291-2304
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054020777
Cited by
710
References
0
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How super-renormalizable interactions cure their infrared divergences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.23.2291
The paper
Jackiw, R., & Templeton, S. (1981). How super-renormalizable interactions cure their infrared divergences. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.23.2291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.