Cited by 1,315Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Limits on a Lorentz- and parity-violating modification of electrodynamics

Carroll, Sean M., Field, George B., Jackiw, Roman·1990·Physical Review D

Abstract

The Chern-Simons Lagrangian has been studied previously in (2+1)-dimensional spacetime, where it is both gauge and Lorentz invariant. In 3+1 dimensions, this term couples the dual electromagnetic tensor to an external four-vector. If we take this four-vector to be fixed, the term is gauge invariant but not Lorentz invariant. In this paper, we examine both the theoretical consequences of such a modification and observational limits we can put on its magnitude. The Chern-Simons term would rotate the plane of polarization of radiation from distant galaxies, an effect which is not observed. From the observations we deduce that the magnitude of the vector is 1.7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}42}$${h}_{0}$ GeV, where ${h}_{0}$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km ${\mathrm{sec}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ ${\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.41.1231

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyzing the plane of polarization of distant galaxies has been used to constrain the kAF term in the mSME to the level of 10−42 GeV.

    “This fact alone has been used to constrain the kAF term in the mSME to the level of 10−42 GeV by analyzing the plane of polarization of distant galaxies [74].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [74]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, S. M., Field, G. B., & Jackiw, R.
Affiliations
Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1990-02-15
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1231-1240
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148545031
Cited by
1,315
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 46
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
Lorentz violation, parity violation, Chern-Simons term, modified electrodynamics, polarization rotation, birefringence, observational constraints, Hubble constant, four-dimensional spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review