Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 855

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting cold dark-matter candidates

Drukier, Andrzej K., Freese, Katherine, Spergel, David N.·1986·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.33.3495
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We consider the use of superheated superconducting colloids as detectors of weakly interacting galactic-halo candidate particles (e.g., photinos, massive neutrinos, and scalar neutrinos). We discuss realistic models for the detector and for the galactic halo. We show that the expected count rate (\ensuremath{\approxeq}${10}^{3}$ count/day for scalar and massive neutrinos) exceeds the expected background by several orders of magnitude. For photinos, we expect \ensuremath{\approxeq}1 count/day, more than 100 times the predicted background rate. We find that if the detector temperature is maintained at 50 mK and using SQUID electronic read out with the system, noise is reduced below 5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}4}$ flux quanta, particles with mass as low as 2 GeV can be detected. Any particle capable of resolving the solar-neutrino problem by altering energy transport in the Sun can be detected. We show that Earth's motion around the Sun can produce a significant annual modulation in the signal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.33.3495

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 855

Metadata

Authors
Drukier, A. K., Freese, K., & Spergel, D. N.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1986-06-15
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
3495-3508
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.33.3495
OpenAlex
W2108317580
Cited by
855
References
38
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.