Probability ofR2inflation
Abstract
The Gibbons-Hawking-Stewart canonical measure is applied to classical Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmologies with an R+\ensuremath{\epsilon}${R}^{2}$ Lagrangian. Both the inflationary solutions and the noninflationary solutions have infinite measure, and the ratio is ambiguous. All but a finite measure of the k=-1 solutions have an arbitrarily long period of near spatial flatness, but for k=+1 there is also an infinite measure for solutions which have a small maximum radius, unlike the case with Einstein gravity coupled to a massive scalar field. For k=-1 there is a finite positive measure for complete nonsingular solutions with a nonzero minimum radius; all other k=-1 solutions expand from zero to infinite radius. For k=+1 all solutions but a set of measure zero expand from zero radius and eventually recollapse to zero radius. However, there is also an apparently fractal set of discrete (zero measure) k=+1 solutions which have no singularities but rather expand and recontract perpetually, with an arbitrary number of oscillations of the scalar curvature between each successive bounce.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A natural measure on the set of all universes
Gibbons, G. W., Hawking, S. W., & Stewart, J. M. (1987) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90425-1 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Canonical measure and the flatness of a FRW universe
Coule, D. H. (1995) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/2/015 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology
COULE, D. H. (2003) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271803003530 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Page, D. N.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Page, Don N.
- ORCID
- Page, Don N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1987-09-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1607-1624
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1542459002
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- canonical measure, FRW cosmology, spatial curvature, measure problem, inflationary solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review