The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalization of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Swendsen-Wang representation and Monte Carlo algorithm
Abstract
We give a simple explanation of the Swendsen-Wang algorithm for Potts models in terms of a joint model of Potts spin variables interacting with bond occupation variables. We then show how to generalize this representation, as well as the corresponding Monte Carlo algorithm, to arbitrary models. We give initial results of tests of the new algorithm on the two-dimensional XY model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, F. Y. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.235 · Cited by 3,570
Cited by
Richardson, M., & Domingos, P. (2006) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-006-5833-1 · Cited by 2,676
Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems
Wolff, U. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.361 · Cited by 2,551
Neal, R. M. (2003) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1056562461 · Cited by 1,361
van Dyk, D. A., & Meng, X.-L. (2001) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/10618600152418584 · Cited by 1,052
Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application
Brooks, S. (1998) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00117 · Cited by 843
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, R. G., & Sokal, A. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1988-09-15
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2009-2012
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023502716
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.