Cited by 2,676Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization

Markov logic networks

Open access
Richardson, Matthew, Domingos, Pedro·2006·Machine Learning

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10994-006-5833-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generative MLNs learn a probabilistic logic program that explains all predicates in an interpretation, not a single target predicate.

    “Generative MLNs learn a (probabilistic) logic program that explains all predicates in an interpretation, not a single target predicate.”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Richardson & Domingos, 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Bacchus, F. (1990). Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Bergadano, F., & Giordana, A. (1988). A knowledge-intensive approach to concept induction. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 305-317). Ann Arbor, MI: Morgan Kaufmann.
  3. Buntine, W. (1994). Operations for learning with graphical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2, 159-225.
  4. Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., & Nocedal, J. (1995). A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 16, 1190-1208.
  5. Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., & Indyk, P. (1998). Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. Pro- ceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 307-318). Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
  6. Collins, M. (2002). Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Philadelphia, PA.
  7. Cumby, C., & Roth, D. (2003). Feature extraction languages for propositionalized relational learning. Proceedings of the IJCAI-2003 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data (pp. 24-31). Acapulco, Mexico: IJCAII.
  8. Cussens, J. (1999). Loglinear models for first-order probabilistic reasoning. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 126-133). Stockholm, Sweden: Morgan Kaufmann.
  9. Cussens, J. (2003). Individuals, relations and structures in probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-2003 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data (pp. 32-36). Acapulco, Mexico: IJCAII.
  10. DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2002). Probability and statistics. Boston, MA: AddisonWesley. 3rd edition.
  11. Dehaspe, L. (1997). Maximum entropy modeling with clausal constraints. Proceedings of the Seventh Inter- national Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (pp. 109-125). Prague, Czech Republic: Springer.
  12. Della Pietra, S., Della Pietra, V., & Lafferty, J. (1997). Inducing features of random fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 380-392.
  13. Dietterich, T., Getoor, L., & Murphy, K. (Eds.). (2003). Proceedings of the ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connections to Other Fields. Banff, Canada: IMLS.
  14. Džeroski, S., & Blockeel, H. (Eds.). (2004). Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining. Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
  15. Džeroski, S., & De Raedt, L. (2003). Special issue on multi-relational data mining: The current frontiers. SIGKDD Explorations, 5.
  16. Džeroski, S., De Raedt, L., & Wrobel, S. (Eds.). (2002). Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining. Edmonton, Canada: ACM Press.
  17. Džeroski, S., De Raedt, L., & Wrobel, S. (Eds.). (2003). Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining. Washington, DC: ACM Press.
  18. Edwards, R., & Sokal, A. (1988). Generalization of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Swendsen-Wang representation and Monte Carlo algorithm. Physics Review D (pp. 2009-2012).
  19. Flake, G. W., Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2000). Efficient identification of Web communities. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 150-160). Boston, MA: ACM Press.
  20. Friedman, N., Getoor, L., Koller, D., & Pfeffer, A. (1999). Learning probabilistic relational models. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1300-1307). Stockholm, Sweden: Morgan Kaufmann.
  21. Genesereth, M. R., & Nilsson, N. J. (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  22. Getoor, L., & Jensen, D. (Eds.). (2000).In Proceedings of the AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data. Austin, TX: AAAI Press.
  23. Getoor, L., & Jensen, D. (Eds.). (2003). In Proceedings of the IJCAI-2003 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data. Acapulco, Mexico: IJCAII.
  24. Geyer, C. J., & Thompson, E. A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 657-699.
  25. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
  26. Heckerman, D., Chickering, D. M., Meek, C., Rounthwaite, R., & Kadie, C. (2000). Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1, 49- 75.
  27. Heckerman, D., Meek, C., & Koller, D. (2004). Probabilistic entity-relationship models, PRMs, and plate models. In Proceedings of the ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connections to Other Fields (pp. 55-60). Banff, Canada: IMLS.
  28. Hulten, G., & Domingos, P. (2002). Mining complex models from arbitrarily large databases in constant time. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 525-531). Edmonton, Canada: ACM Press.
  29. Jaeger, M. (1998). Reasoning about infinite random structures with relational Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Trento, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann.
  30. Kautz, H., Selman, B., & Jiang, Y. (1997). A general stochastic approach to solving problems with hard and soft constraints. In D. Gu, J. Du & P. Pardalos (Eds.), The satisfiability problem: Theory and applications, (pp. 573-586). New York, NY: American Mathematical Society.
  31. Kersting, K., & De Raedt, L. (2001). Towards combining inductive logic programming with Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (pp. 118-131). Strasbourg, France: Springer.
  32. Laffar, J., & Lassez, J. (1987). Constraint logic programming. Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Principles of Programming Languages (pp. 111-119). Munich, Germany: ACM Press.
  33. Lloyd, J. W. (1987). Foundations of logic programming. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  34. Lloyd-Richardson, E., Kazura, A., Stanton, C., Niaura, R., & Papandonatos, G. (2002). Differentiating stages of smoking intensity among adolescents: Stage-specific psychological and social influences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70.
  35. Milch, B., Marthi, B., & Russell, S. (2004). BLOG: Relational modeling with unknown objects. Proceedings of the ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connections to Other Fields (pp. 67-73). Banff, Canada: IMLS.
  36. Muggleton, S. (1996). Stochastic logic programs. In L. De Raedt (Ed.), Advances in inductive logic programming (pp.254-264). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
  37. Neville, J., & Jensen, D. (2003). Collective classification with relational dependency networks. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (pp. 77-91). Washington, DC: ACM Press.
  38. Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (1999). Numerical Optimization. New York, NY: Springer.
  39. Parag, & Domingos, P. (2004). Multi-relational record linkage. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining. Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
  40. Pasula, H., & Russell, S. (2001). Approximate inference for first-order probabilistic languages. In Proceed- ings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 741-748). Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  41. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  42. Poole, D. (2003). First-order probabilistic inference. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 985-991). Acapulco, Mexico: Morgan Kaufmann.
  43. Popescul, A., & Ungar, L. H. (2003). Structural logistic regression for link analysis. In Proceedings of the Sec- ond International Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (pp. 92-106). Washington, DC: ACM Press.
  44. Puech, A., & Muggleton, S. (2003). A comparison of stochastic logic programs and Bayesian logic programs. Proceedings of the IJCAI-2003 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data (pp. 121-129). Acapulco, Mexico: IJCAII.
  45. Richardson, M., & Domingos, P. (2003). Building large knowledge bases by mass collaboration. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Capture (pp. 129-137). Sanibel Island, FL: ACM Press.
  46. Riezler, S. (1998). Probabilistic constraint logic programming. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany.
  47. Robinson, J. A. (1965). A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. Journal of the ACM, 12, 23-41.
  48. Sanghai, S., Domingos, P., & Weld, D. (2003). Dynamic probabilistic relational models. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 992-997). Acapulco, Mexico: Morgan Kaufmann. Springer
  49. Santos Costa, V., Page, D., Qazi, M., , & Cussens, J. (2003). CLP(BN): Constraint logic programming for probabilistic knowledge. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 517-524). Acapulco, Mexico: Morgan Kaufmann.
  50. Sato, T., & Kameya, Y. (1997). PRISM: A symbolic-statistical modeling language. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1330-1335). Nagoya, Japan: Morgan Kaufmann.
  51. Taskar, B., Abbeel, P., & Koller, D. (2002). Discriminative probabilistic models for relational data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 485-492). Edmonton, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann.
  52. Wellman, M., Breese, J. S., & Goldman, R. P. (1992). From knowledge bases to decision models. Knowledge Engineering Review, 7.
  53. Yedidia, J. S., Freeman, W. T., & Weiss, Y. (2001). Generalized belief propagation. In T. Leen, T. Dietterich and V. Tresp (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 13, 689-695. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  54. Zhu, C., Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., & Nocedal, J. (1997). Algorithm 778: L-BFGSB, FORTRAN routines for large scale bound constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 23, 550-560.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, M., & Domingos, P.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Domingos, Pedro
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
2006-01-27
Volume
62
Issue
1-2
Pages
107-136
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W1977970897
Cited by
2,676
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 169 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 156 · 2016: 193 · 2015: 191 · 2014: 180 · 2013: 184 · 2012: 175
FWCI
122.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research (N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Keywords
Markov logic networks, first-order logic, probabilistic graphical models, knowledge base, MCMC inference, inductive logic programming, relational databases, knowledge base learning, query answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review