Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bounds on the mass ofWRand theWL−WRmixing angleζin generalSU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)models

Langacker, Paul, Sankar, S. Uma·1989·Physical Review D

Abstract

We consider the phenomenological constraints on the mass ${M}_{R}$ and the ${W}_{L}\ensuremath{-}{W}_{R}$ mixing angle $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ in a very general class of $\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{L}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{R}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)$ models. In particular, almost no model-dependent assumptions are made concerning left-right symmetry or the Higgs structure of the theory, which means that ${U}^{R}$, the mixing matrix for right-handed quarks, is unrelated to the left-handed Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix ${U}^{L}$. We consider a number of possibilities for the neutrinos occurring in right-handed currents, including (a) heavy Majorana neutrinos, (b) heavy Dirac neutrinos, (c) intermediate-mass (10-100 MeV) neutrinos, and (d) light neutrinos (e.g., the Dirac partners of the ordinary left-handed neutrinos). For each case we utilize relevant constraints from the ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{-}{K}_{S}$ mass difference, ${B}_{d}{\overline{B}}_{d}$ oscillations, the $b$ semileptonic branching ratio and decay rate, neutrinoless double-beta decay, theoretical relations between mass and mixing, universality, nonleptonic kaon decays, muon decay, and astrophysical constraints from nucleosynthesis and SN 1987A. As is to be expected the limits on ${M}_{R}$ are considerably weaker than for the special case of manifest or pseudomanifest left-right symmetry (${M}_{R}>1.4$ TeV). In fact, if extreme fine-tuning is allowed the ${W}_{R}$ could be as light as the ordinary ${W}_{L}$. However, with reasonable restrictions on fine-tuning one obtains ${M}_{R}>300$ GeV for ${g}_{R}={g}_{L}$, with more stringent limits holding for most of parameter space. If $\mathrm{CP}$-violating phases in ${U}^{R}$ are small the limit on mixing ($|\ensuremath{\zeta}|<0.0025$ for ${g}_{R}={g}_{L}$) is almost as stringent as for the case of left-right symmetry. For large phases $|\ensuremath{\zeta}|$ could be as large as \ensuremath{\sim}0.013.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.40.1569

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Langacker, P., & Sankar, S. U.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1989-09-01
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1569-1585
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1748591433
Cited by
274
References
18
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bounds on the mass ofWRand theWL−WRmixing angleζin generalSU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.40.1569
The paper
Langacker, P., & Sankar, S. U. (1989). Bounds on the mass ofWRand theWL−WRmixing angleζin generalSU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)models. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.40.1569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.