The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing density fluctuation spectra in inflation
Abstract
Scale-invariant (flat) fluctuation spectra are the most natural outcomes of inflation. Nonetheless current large-scale-structure observations seem to indicate more fluctuation power on large scales than flat spectra give. We consider a wide variety of models based on the chaotic inflation paradigm and sketch the effects that varying the expansion rate, structure of the potential surface, and the curvature coupling constants have on the quantum fluctuation spectra. We calculate in detail the quantum generation of fluctuation spectra by numerically solving the linearized perturbation equations for multiple scalar fields, the metric, and the radiation into which the scalars dissipate, following the evolution from inside the horizon through reheating.We conclude that (1) useful extended nonflat power laws are very difficult to realize in inflation, (2) double inflation leading to a mountain leveling off at a high-amplitude plateau at long wavelengths is generic, but to tune the cliff rising up to the plateau to lie in an interesting wavelength range, a special choice of initial conditions and/or scalar field potentials is required, and (3) small mountains (moguls) on the potential surface lead to mountains of extra power in the fluctuations added on top of an underlying flat spectrum. For quadratic and quartic couplings, the mountain fluctuations may obey Gaussian statistics but the spectral form will be very sensitive to initial conditions as well as potential parameters; non-Gaussian mountain fluctuations which depend upon potential parameters but not on initial field conditions will be the more likely outcome. However, adding cubic couplings can give mountains obeying Gaussian statistics independently of initial conditions.Since observations only probe a narrow patch of the potential surface, it is possible that it is littered with moguls, leading to arbitrarily complex ``mountain range'' spectra that can only be determined phenomenologically. We also construct an inflation model which houses the chaotic inflation picture within the grand unified theory (GUT) framework. The standard chaotic picture requires an unnaturally flat scalar field potential, \ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\approxeq}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}14}$, and a strong curvature coupling parameter bound, \ensuremath{\xi}<0.002. By allowing the Higgs field to be strongly coupled to gravity through a large negative curvature coupling strength, \ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\sim}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}10}^{4}$, so the Planck mass depends on the GUT Higgs field, the Higgs field can be strongly coupled to matter fields [with \ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\sim}(\ensuremath{\xi}${/10}^{5}$${)}^{2}$]. This leads to both a flat Zeldovich spectrum of the ``observed'' amplitude and a high reheating temperature (\ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{15}$ GeV), unlike the \ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}13}$ standard case. The large -\ensuremath{\xi} would be related to the ratio of the Planck scale to a typical GUT scale. Although a single dynamically important Higgs multiplet gives flat spectra, a richer Higgs sector could lead to broken scale invariance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Self-citationHartle, J. B., & Hawking, S. W. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2960 · Cited by 3,027
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
Self-citation
Cited by
Theory of cosmological perturbations
Mukhanov, V (1992) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-z · Cited by 3,608
Planck 2018 results: X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration, Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 · Cited by 2,442
Self-citationParticle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation
Lyth, D. H., & Riotto, A. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(98)00128-8 · Cited by 2,064
False vacuum inflation with Einstein gravity
Copeland, E. J., Liddle, A. R., Lyth, D. H., Stewart, E. D., & Wands, D. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6410 · Cited by 1,077
Metric perturbations in two-field inflation
García-Bellido, J., & Wands, D. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.5437 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Salopek, D. S., Bond, J. R., & Bardeen, J. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-09-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1753-1788
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022354167
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.