The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Near optimal solution to the inverse problem for gravitational-wave bursts
Abstract
We develop a method for determining the source direction (\ensuremath{\theta},\ensuremath{\varphi}) and the two waveforms ${h}_{+}$(t), ${h}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$(t) of a gravitational-wave burst using noisy data from three wideband gravitational-wave detectors running in coincidence. The scheme does not rely on any assumptions about the waveforms and in fact it works for gravitational-wave bursts of any kind. To improve the accuracy of the solution for (\ensuremath{\theta},\ensuremath{\varphi}), ${h}_{+}$(t), ${h}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$(t), we construct a near optimal filter for the noisy data which is deduced from the data themselves. We implement the method numerically using simulated data for detectors that operate, with white Gaussian noise, in the frequency band of 500--2500 Hz. We show that for broadband signals centered around 1 kHz with a conventional signal-to-noise ratio of at least 10 in each detector we are able to locate the source within a solid angle of 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}5}$ sr. If the signals and the detectors' band were scaled downwards in frequency by a factor \ensuremath{\iota}, at fixed signal-to-noise ratio, then the solid angle of the source's error box would increase by a factor ${\ensuremath{\iota}}^{2}$. The simulated data are assumed to be produced by three detectors: one on the east coast of the United States of America, one on the west coast of the United States of America, and the third in Germany or Western Australia. For conventional signal-to-noise ratios significantly lower than 10 the method still converges to the correct combination of the relative time delays but it is unable to distinguish between the two mirror-image directions defined by the relative time delays. The angular spread around these points increases as the signal-to-noise ratio decreases. For conventional signal-to-noise ratios near 1 the method loses its resolution completely.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients
Newman, E., & Penrose, R. (1962) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1724257 · Cited by 2,702
Cited by
LIGO: The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Abramovici, A., Althouse, W. E., Drever, R. W. P., Gürsel, Y., Kawamura, S., Raab, F. J., Shoemaker, D., Sievers, L., Spero, R. E., Thorne, K. S., et al. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5055.325 · Cited by 2,244
Self-citationCutler, C., & Flanagan, É. E. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.2658 · Cited by 1,615
Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Schutz, B. F. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-2 · Cited by 874
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J., & Thorne, K. S. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6274 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Gürsel, Y., & Tinto, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-12-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3884-3938
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131573747
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.