The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?
Open accessAbstract
The most promising source of gravitational waves for the planned kilometer-size laser-interferometer detectors LIGO and VIRGO are merging compact binaries, i.e., neutron-star--neutron-star (NS-NS), neutron-star--black-hole (NS-BH), and black-hole--black-hole (BH-BH) binaries. We investigate how accurately the distance to the source and the masses and spins of the two bodies will be measured from the inspiral gravitational wave signals by the three-detector LIGO-VIRGO network using ``advanced detectors'' (those present a few years after initial operation). The large number of cycles in the observable waveform increases our sensitivity to those parameters that affect the inspiral rate, and thereby the evolution of the waveform's phase. These parameters are thus measured much more accurately than parameters which affect the waveform's polarization or amplitude. To lowest order in a post-Newtonian expansion, the evolution of the waveform's phase depends only on the combination scrM\ensuremath{\equiv}(${\mathit{M}}_{1}$${\mathit{M}}_{2}$${)}^{3/5}$(${\mathit{M}}_{1}$+${\mathit{M}}_{2}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/5}$ of the masses ${\mathit{M}}_{1}$ and ${\mathit{M}}_{2}$ of the two bodies, which is known as the ``chirp mass.'' To post-1-Newtonian order, the waveform's phase also depends sensitively on the binary's reduced mass \ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\equiv}${\mathit{M}}_{1}$${\mathit{M}}_{2}$/(${\mathit{M}}_{1}$+${\mathit{M}}_{2}$) allowing, in principle, a measurement of both ${\mathit{M}}_{1}$ and ${\mathit{M}}_{2}$ with high accuracy.We show that the principal obstruction to measuring ${\mathit{M}}_{1}$ and ${\mathit{M}}_{2}$ is the post-1.5-Newtonian effect of the bodies' spins on the waveform's phase, which can mimic the effects that allow \ensuremath{\mu} to be determined. The chirp mass is measurable with an accuracy \ensuremath{\Delta}scrM/scrM\ensuremath{\approxeq}0.1%--1%. Although this is a remarkably small error bar, it is \ensuremath{\sim}10 times larger than previous estimates of \ensuremath{\Delta}scrM/scrM which neglected post-Newtonian effects. The reduced mass is measurable to \ensuremath{\sim}10%--15% for NS-NS and NS-BH binaries, and \ensuremath{\sim}50% for BH-BH binaries (assuming 10${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}}$ BH's). Measurements of the masses and spins are strongly correlated; there is a combination of \ensuremath{\mu} and the spin angular momenta that is measured to within \ensuremath{\sim}1%. Moreover, if both spins were somehow known to be small (\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.01${\mathit{M}}_{1}^{2}$ and \ensuremath{\lesssim}0.01${\mathit{M}}_{2}^{2}$, respectively), then \ensuremath{\mu} could be determined to within \ensuremath{\sim}1%. Finally, building on earlier work of Markovi\ifmmode \acute{c}\else \'{c}\fi{}, we derive an approximate, analytic expression for the accuracy \ensuremath{\Delta}D of mesurements of the distance D to the binary, for an arbitrary network of detectors. This expression is accurate to linear order in 1/\ensuremath{\rho}, where \ensuremath{\rho} is the signal-to-noise ratio. We also show that, contrary to previous expectations, contributions to \ensuremath{\Delta}D/D that are nonlinear in 1/\ensuremath{\rho} are significant, and we develop an approximation scheme for including the dominant of these nonlinear effects. Using a Monte Carlo simulation we estimate that distance measurement accuracies will be \ensuremath{\le}15% for \ensuremath{\sim}8% of the detected signals, and \ensuremath{\le}30% for \ensuremath{\sim}60% of the signals, for the LIGO-VIRGO three-detector network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.241103 · Cited by 3,435
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutler, C., & Flanagan, É. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-03-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2658-2697
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139823471
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.49.2658
- The paper
- Cutler, C., & Flanagan, É. E. (1994). Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.49.2658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.