Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvement on cosmological chaotic inflation through nonminimal coupling

Fakir, Redouane, Unruh, William G.·1990·Physical Review D

Abstract

Models of cosmological inflation are plagued with a severe and seemingly unavoidable problem: in order to produce density perturbations of an amplitude consistent with large-scale observations, the self-coupling $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ of the inflaton field has to be tuned to an excessively small value. In all these models, however, the scalar field is taken to be minimally coupled to the scalar curvature ($\ensuremath{\xi}=0$). It is shown here that in the more general case of nonminimal coupling ($\ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\ne}0$), and within the framework of Linde's chaotic inflation, the constraint on the self-coupling could be relaxed by several orders of magnitude. We are led to this conclusion by the combination of two key results. (1) Contrary to previous common belief, the curvature coupling $\ensuremath{\xi}$ can be almost arbitrarily large without upsetting the inflationary scenario. In fact, the larger $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is, the better the model behaves. (2) Considerations regarding the amplitude of density perturbations constrain the ratio $\frac{\ensuremath{\lambda}}{{\ensuremath{\xi}}^{2}}$ rather than $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. Thus, by a suitable choice of $\ensuremath{\xi}$, the self-coupling $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ can be made as large as desired. It is found that for large $\ensuremath{\xi}$ the amplitude of density perturbations is much smaller than in $\ensuremath{\xi}=0$ models: ${(\ensuremath{\delta}\frac{\ensuremath{\rho}}{\ensuremath{\rho}})|}_{\ensuremath{\xi}>1}\ensuremath{\approx}{(48N{\ensuremath{\xi}}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rho}}{\ensuremath{\rho}})|}_{\ensuremath{\xi}=0}$, where $N\ensuremath{\sim}70$. For example, this represents a drop of over 4 orders of magnitude for $\ensuremath{\xi}={10}^{3}$. This same value results in a dramatic 9 orders of magnitude weakening of the constraint on $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ according to our formula ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{constraint}|\ensuremath{\xi}>1}\ensuremath{\approx}48N{\ensuremath{\xi}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{constraint}|\ensuremath{\xi}=0}$. Non-minimal coupling may thus provide a relatively simple solution to the long-standing problem of excessive density perturbations in inflationary models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.41.1783

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Fakir, R., & Unruh, W. G.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1990-03-15
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
1783-1791
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116232075
Cited by
416
References
5
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement on cosmological chaotic inflation through nonminimal coupling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.41.1783
The paper
Fakir, R., & Unruh, W. G. (1990). Improvement on cosmological chaotic inflation through nonminimal coupling. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.41.1783

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.