Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves

Friedman, John, Morris, Michael S., Novikov, Igor D., Echeverria, Fernando, Klinkhammer, Gunnar, Thorne, Kip S., Yurtsever, Ulvi·1990·Physical Review D

Abstract

The laws of physics might permit the existence, in the real Universe, of closed timelike curves (CTC's). Macroscopic CTC's might be a semiclassical consequence of Planck-scale, quantum gravitational, Lorentzian foam, if such foam exists. If CTC's are permitted, then the semiclassical laws of physics (the laws with gravity classical and other fields quantized or classical) should be augmented by a principle of self-consistency, which states that a local solution to the equations of physics can occur in the real Universe only if it can be extended to be part of a global solution, one which is well defined throughout the (nonsingular regions of) classical spacetime. The consequences of this principle are explored for the Cauchy problem of the evolution of a classical, massless scalar field \ensuremath{\Phi} (satisfying \ensuremath{\square}\ensuremath{\Phi}=0) in several model spacetimes with CTC's.In general, self-consistency constrains the initial data for the field \ensuremath{\Phi}. For a family of spacetimes with traversible wormholes, which initially possess no CTC's and then evolve them to the future of a stable Cauchy horizon scrH, self-consistency seems to place no constraints on initial data for \ensuremath{\Phi} that are posed on past null infinity, and none on data posed on spacelike slices which precede scrH.By contrast, initial data posed in the future of scrH, where the CTC's reside, are constrained; but the constraints appear to be mild in the sense that in some neighborhood of every event one is free to specify initial data arbitrarily, with the initial data elsewhere being adjusted to guarantee self-consistent evolution. A spacetime whose self-consistency constraints have this property is defined to be ``benign with respect to the scalar field \ensuremath{\Phi}.'' The question is posed as to whether benign spacetimes in some sense form a generic subset of all spacetimes with CTC's. It is shown that in the set of flat, spatially and temporally closed, 2-dimensional spacetimes the benign ones are not generic. However, it seems likely that every 4-dimensional, asymptotically flat space-time that is stable and has a topology of the form R\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}(S-one point), where S is a closed 3-manifold, is benign. Wormhole spacetimes are of this type, with S=${\mathit{S}}^{1}$\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${\mathit{S}}^{2}$. We suspect that these types of self-consistency behavior of the scalar field \ensuremath{\Phi} are typical for noninteracting (linearly superposing), classical fields.However, interacting classical systems can behave quite differently, as is demonstrated by a study of the motion of a hard-sphere billiard ball in a wormhole spacetime with closed timelike curves: If the ball is classical, then some choices of initial data (some values of the ball's initial position and velocity) give rise to unique, self-consistent motions of the ball; other choices produce two different self-consistent motions; and others might (but we are not yet sure) produce no self-consistent motions whatsoever. By contrast, in a path-integral formulation of the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of such a billiard ball, there appears to be a unique, self-consistent set of probabilities for the outcomes of all measurements. This paper's conclusion, that CTC's may not be as nasty as people have assumed, is reinforced by the fact that they do not affect Gauss's theorem and thus do not affect the derivation of global conservation laws from differential ones. The standard conservation laws remain valid globally, and in asymptotically flat, wormhole spacetimes they retain a natural, quasilocal interpretation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.42.1915

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, J., Morris, M. S., Novikov, I. D., Echeverria, F., Klinkhammer, G., Thorne, K. S., & Yurtsever, U.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1990-09-15
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1915-1930
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080598130
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
25.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.